Goal-Aware Prediction: Learning to Model What Matters
Suraj Nair, Silvio Savarese, Chelsea Finn
Abstract
Learned dynamics models combined with both planning and policy learning algorithms have shown promise in enabling artificial agents to learn to perform many diverse tasks with limited supervision. However, one of the fundamental challenges in using a learned forward dynamics model is the mismatch between the objective of the learned model (future state reconstruction), and that of the downstream planner or policy (completing a specified task). This issue is exacerbated by vision-based control tasks in diverse real-world environments, where the complexity of the real world dwarfs model capacity. In this paper, we propose to direct prediction towards task relevant information, enabling the model to be aware of the current task and encouraging it to only model relevant quantities of the state space, resulting in a learning objective that more closely matches the downstream task. Further, we do so in an entirely self-supervised manner, without the need for a reward function or image labels. We find that our method more effectively models the relevant parts of the scene conditioned on the goal, and as a result outperforms standard task-agnostic dynamics models and model-free reinforcement learning.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1e407221-9b95-4253-b009-1a673b877122Cited by top-tier papers21
- Learning from Reward-Free Offline Data: A Case for Planning with Latent Dynamics ModelsUladzislau Sobal, Wancong Zhang, Kyunghyun Cho, Randall Balestriero et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 109 citations
- Dreamwalker: Mental Planning for Continuous Vision-Language NavigationHanqing Wang, Wei Liang, Luc Van Gool, Wenguan WangICCV 2023 · 98 citations
- C-Learning: Learning to Achieve Goals via Recursive ClassificationBenjamin Eysenbach, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, Sergey LevineICLR 2021 · 96 citations
- Generalizing Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning with Variational Causal ReasoningWenhao Ding, Haohong Lin, Bo Li, Ding ZhaoNeurIPS 2022 · 59 citations
- Value Gradient weighted Model-Based Reinforcement LearningClaas Voelcker, Victor Liao, Animesh Garg, Amir-massoud FarahmandICLR 2022 · 37 citations
Builds on8
- Dream to Control: Learning Behaviors by Latent ImaginationDanijar Hafner, Timothy P. Lillicrap, Jimmy Ba, Mohammad NorouziICLR 2020 · 1,852 citations
- Model Based Reinforcement Learning for AtariLukasz Kaiser, Mohammad Babaeizadeh, Piotr Milos, Blazej Osinski et al.ICLR 2020 · 969 citations
- Stochastic Latent Actor-Critic: Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Latent Variable ModelAlex X. Lee, Anusha Nagabandi, Pieter Abbeel, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2020 · 437 citations
- Exploring Model-based Planning with Policy NetworksTingwu Wang, Jimmy BaICLR 2020 · 164 citations
- Hierarchical Foresight: Self-Supervised Learning of Long-Horizon Tasks via Visual Subgoal GenerationSuraj Nair, Chelsea FinnICLR 2020 · 152 citations
Related papers
- Model-Based Visual Planning with Self-Supervised Functional DistancesStephen Tian, Suraj Nair, Frederik Ebert, Sudeep Dasari et al.ICLR 2021 · 69 citations
- Planning from Pixels using Inverse Dynamics ModelsKeiran Paster, Sheila A. McIlraith, Jimmy BaICLR 2021 · 44 citations
- Dynamics-Aware EmbeddingsWilliam F. Whitney, Rajat Agarwal, Kyunghyun Cho, Abhinav GuptaICLR 2020
- Object-Oriented Dynamics Learning through Multi-Level AbstractionGuangxiang Zhu, Jianhao Wang, Zhizhou Ren, Zichuan Lin et al.AAAI 2020 · 6 citations
- Learning to Model the World With LanguageJessy Lin, Yuqing Du, Olivia Watkins, Danijar Hafner et al.ICML 2024 · 76 citations
