Transfer RL across Observation Feature Spaces via Model-Based Regularization
Yanchao Sun, Ruijie Zheng, Xiyao Wang, Andrew E. Cohen, Furong Huang
Abstract
In many reinforcement learning (RL) applications, the observation space is specified by human developers and restricted by physical realizations, and may thus be subject to dramatic changes over time (e.g. increased number of observable features). However, when the observation space changes, the previous policy will likely fail due to the mismatch of input features, and another policy must be trained from scratch, which is inefficient in terms of computation and sample complexity. Following theoretical insights, we propose a novel algorithm which extracts the latent-space dynamics in the source task, and transfers the dynamics model to the target task to use as a model-based regularizer. Our algorithm works for drastic changes of observation space (e.g. from vector-based observation to image-based observation), without any inter-task mapping or any prior knowledge of the target task. Empirical results show that our algorithm significantly improves the efficiency and stability of learning in the target task.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1e20db29-a0b9-4ea5-8a49-705f962ea9f2Cited by top-tier papers11
- Reincarnating Reinforcement Learning: Reusing Prior Computation to Accelerate ProgressRishabh Agarwal, Max Schwarzer, Pablo Samuel Castro, Aaron C. Courville et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 95 citations
- TACO: Temporal Latent Action-Driven Contrastive Loss for Visual Reinforcement LearningRuijie Zheng, Xiyao Wang, Yanchao Sun, Shuang Ma et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 89 citations
- Overcoming the Sim-to-Real Gap: Leveraging Simulation to Learn to Explore for Real-World RLAndrew Wagenmaker, Kevin Huang, Liyiming Ke, Kevin Jamieson et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 45 citations
- Privileged Sensing Scaffolds Reinforcement LearningEdward S. Hu, James Springer, Oleh Rybkin, Dinesh JayaramanICLR 2024 · 21 citations
- Live in the Moment: Learning Dynamics Model Adapted to Evolving PolicyXiyao Wang, Wichayaporn Wongkamjan, Ruonan Jia, Furong HuangICML 2023 · 20 citations
Builds on14
- A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual RepresentationsTing Chen, Simon Kornblith, Mohammad Norouzi, Geoffrey E. HintonICML 2020 · 24,064 citations
- Dream to Control: Learning Behaviors by Latent ImaginationDanijar Hafner, Timothy P. Lillicrap, Jimmy Ba, Mohammad NorouziICLR 2020 · 1,852 citations
- CURL: Contrastive Unsupervised Representations for Reinforcement LearningMichael Laskin, Aravind Srinivas, Pieter AbbeelICML 2020 · 1,261 citations
- Stochastic Latent Actor-Critic: Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Latent Variable ModelAlex X. Lee, Anusha Nagabandi, Pieter Abbeel, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2020 · 437 citations
- Decoupling Representation Learning from Reinforcement LearningAdam Stooke, Kimin Lee, Pieter Abbeel, Michael LaskinICML 2021 · 389 citations
Related papers
- Extracting Latent State Representations with Linear Dynamics from Rich ObservationsAbraham Frandsen, Rong Ge, Holden LeeICML 2022 · 1 citation
- Provably sample-efficient RL with side information about latent dynamicsYao Liu, Dipendra Misra, Miro Dudík, Robert E. SchapireNeurIPS 2022 · 2 citations
- Model-Based Reinforcement Learning via Imagination with Derived MemoryYao Mu, Yuzheng Zhuang, Bin Wang, Guangxiang Zhu et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 14 citations
- Planning from Pixels using Inverse Dynamics ModelsKeiran Paster, Sheila A. McIlraith, Jimmy BaICLR 2021 · 44 citations
- Reinforcement Learning Under Latent Dynamics: Toward Statistical and Algorithmic ModularityPhilip Amortila, Dylan J. Foster, Nan Jiang, Akshay Krishnamurthy et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 6 citations
