Versatile Verification of Tree Ensembles
Laurens Devos, Wannes Meert, Jesse Davis
Abstract
Machine learned models often must abide by certain requirements (e.g., fairness or legal). This has spurred interested in developing approaches that can provably verify whether a model satisfies certain properties. This paper introduces a generic algorithm called Veritas that enables tackling multiple different verification tasks for tree ensemble models like random forests (RFs) and gradient boosting decision trees (GBDTs). This generality contrasts with previous work, which has focused exclusively on either adversarial example generation or robustness checking. Veritas formulates the verification task as a generic optimization problem and introduces a novel search space representation. Veritas offers two key advantages. First, it provides anytime lower and upper bounds when the optimization problem cannot be solved exactly. In contrast, many existing methods have focused on exact solutions and are thus limited by the verification problem being NP-complete. Second, Veritas produces full (bounded suboptimal) solutions that can be used to generate concrete examples. We experimentally show that Veritas outperforms the previous state of the art by (a) generating exact solutions more frequently, (b) producing tighter bounds when (a) is not possible, and (c) offering orders of magnitude speed ups. Subsequently, Veritas enables tackling more and larger real-world verification scenarios.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers8
- On the Safety of Interpretable Machine Learning: A Maximum Deviation ApproachDennis Wei, Rahul Nair, Amit Dhurandhar, Kush R. Varshney et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 12 citations
- Faster Repeated Evasion Attacks in Tree EnsemblesLorenzo Cascioli, Laurens Devos, Ondrej Kuzelka, Jesse DavisNeurIPS 2024 · 3 citations
- Data-Aware and Scalable Sensitivity Analysis for Decision Tree EnsemblesNamrita Varshney, Ashutosh Gupta, Arhaan Ahmad, Tanay Vineet Tayal et al.ICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- PINE: Pruning Boosted Tree Ensembles with Conformal In-Distribution Prediction EquivalenceHaruki Yajima, Yusuke MatsuiICML 2026
- Quantifying Sensitivity for Tree Ensembles: A Symbolic and Compositional ApproachAjinkya Naik, Chaitanya Garg, S. Akshay, Ashutosh Gupta et al.CAV 2026
Builds on2
Related papers
- Sensitivity Verification for Additive Decision Tree EnsemblesArhaan Ahmad, Tanay Vineet Tayal, Ashutosh Gupta, S. AkshayICLR 2025
- OC-space: a Unifying Perspective on Verification of Tree EnsemblesTimo Martens, Laurens Devos, Lorenzo Cascioli, Wannes Meert et al.ICML 2026
- Verifiable Boosted Tree EnsemblesStefano Calzavara, Lorenzo Cazzaro, Claudio Lucchese, Giulio Ermanno PibiriS&P 2025
- On Lp-norm Robustness of Ensemble Decision Stumps and TreesYihan Wang, Huan Zhang, Hongge Chen, Duane S. Boning et al.ICML 2020 · 11 citations
- Verifiable Learning for Robust Tree EnsemblesStefano Calzavara, Lorenzo Cazzaro, Giulio Ermanno Pibiri, Nicola PrezzaCCS 2023 · 1 citation
