On Lp-norm Robustness of Ensemble Decision Stumps and Trees
Yihan Wang, Huan Zhang, Hongge Chen, Duane S. Boning, Cho-Jui Hsieh
Abstract
Recent papers have demonstrated that ensemble stumps and trees could be vulnerable to small input perturbations, so robustness verification and defense for those models have become an important research problem. However, due to the structure of decision trees, where each node makes decision purely based on one feature value, all the previous works only consider the ∞ norm perturbation. To study robustness with respect to a general p norm perturbation, one has to consider the correlation between perturbations on different features, which has not been handled by previous algorithms. In this paper, we study the problem of robustness verification and certified defense with respect to general p norm perturbations for ensemble decision stumps and trees. For robustness verification of ensemble stumps, we prove that complete verification is NP-complete for p ∈ (0, ∞) while polynomial time algorithms exist for p = 0 or ∞. For p ∈ (0, ∞) we develop an efficient dynamic programming based algorithm for sound verification of ensemble stumps. For ensemble trees, we generalize the previous multi-level robustness verification algorithm to p norm. We demonstrate the first certified defense method for training ensemble stumps and trees with respect to p norm perturbations, and verify its effectiveness empirically on real datasets.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6093c2fd-4d70-467c-ac0e-577208d74c05Cited by top-tier papers12
- An Efficient Adversarial Attack for Tree EnsemblesChong Zhang, Huan Zhang, Cho-Jui HsiehNeurIPS 2020 · 30 citations
- (De-)Randomized Smoothing for Decision Stump EnsemblesMiklós Z. Horváth, Mark Niklas Müller, Marc Fischer, Martin T. VechevNeurIPS 2022 · 7 citations
- Learning Decision Trees and Forests with Algorithmic RecourseKentaro Kanamori, Takuya Takagi, Ken Kobayashi, Yuichi IkeICML 2024 · 4 citations
- Transferable Adversarial Robustness for Categorical Data via Universal Robust EmbeddingsKlim Kireev, Maksym Andriushchenko, Carmela Troncoso, Nicolas FlammarionNeurIPS 2023 · 4 citations
- Faster Repeated Evasion Attacks in Tree EnsemblesLorenzo Cascioli, Laurens Devos, Ondrej Kuzelka, Jesse DavisNeurIPS 2024 · 3 citations
Builds on6
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 9,786 citations
- On Adaptive Attacks to Adversarial Example DefensesFlorian Tramèr, Nicholas Carlini, Wieland Brendel, Aleksander MadryNeurIPS 2020 · 1,026 citations
- AI2: Safety and Robustness Certification of Neural Networks with Abstract InterpretationTimon Gehr, Matthew Mirman, Dana Drachsler-Cohen, Petar Tsankov et al.S&P 2018 · 987 citations
- Towards Stable and Efficient Training of Verifiably Robust Neural NetworksHuan Zhang, Hongge Chen, Chaowei Xiao, Sven Gowal et al.ICLR 2020 · 384 citations
- Abstract Interpretation of Decision Tree Ensemble ClassifiersFrancesco Ranzato, Marco ZanellaAAAI 2020 · 50 citations
Related papers
- Verifiable Boosted Tree EnsemblesStefano Calzavara, Lorenzo Cazzaro, Claudio Lucchese, Giulio Ermanno PibiriS&P 2025
- OC-space: a Unifying Perspective on Verification of Tree EnsemblesTimo Martens, Laurens Devos, Lorenzo Cascioli, Wannes Meert et al.ICML 2026
- Sensitivity Verification for Additive Decision Tree EnsemblesArhaan Ahmad, Tanay Vineet Tayal, Ashutosh Gupta, S. AkshayICLR 2025
- On the Certified Robustness for Ensemble Models and BeyondZhuolin Yang, Linyi Li, Xiaojun Xu, Bhavya Kailkhura et al.ICLR 2022 · 57 citations
- AGNNCert: Defending Graph Neural Networks against Arbitrary Perturbations with Deterministic CertificationJiate Li, Binghui WangUSENIX Security 2025
