Information-Theoretic Analysis of Unsupervised Domain Adaptation
Ziqiao Wang, Yongyi Mao
Abstract
This paper uses information-theoretic tools to analyze the generalization error in unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA). We present novel upper bounds for two notions of generalization errors. The first notion measures the gap between the population risk in the target domain and that in the source domain, and the second measures the gap between the population risk in the target domain and the empirical risk in the source domain. While our bounds for the first kind of error are in line with the traditional analysis and give similar insights, our bounds on the second kind of error are algorithm-dependent, which also provide insights into algorithm designs. Specifically, we present two simple techniques for improving generalization in UDA and validate them experimentally.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1d1a2117-9d12-4cb3-8846-8575fa23cbbaCited by top-tier papers8
- Tighter Information-Theoretic Generalization Bounds from SupersamplesZiqiao Wang, Yongyi MaoICML 2023 · 23 citations
- Enhancing Domain Adaptation through Prompt Gradient AlignmentViet Hoang Phan, Tung Lam Tran, Quyen Tran, Trung LeNeurIPS 2024 · 18 citations
- On -Divergence Principled Domain Adaptation: An Improved FrameworkZiqiao Wang, Yongyi MaoNeurIPS 2024 · 13 citations
- Sample-Conditioned Hypothesis Stability Sharpens Information-Theoretic Generalization BoundsZiqiao Wang, Yongyi MaoNeurIPS 2023 · 8 citations
- Towards Generalization beyond Pointwise Learning: A Unified Information-theoretic PerspectiveYuxin Dong, Tieliang Gong, Hong Chen, Zhongjiang He et al.ICML 2024 · 4 citations
Builds on12
- Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain AdaptationJian Liang, Dapeng Hu, Jiashi FengICML 2020 · 1,624 citations
- In Search of Lost Domain GeneralizationIshaan Gulrajani, David Lopez-PazICLR 2021 · 1,416 citations
- On the Origin of Implicit Regularization in Stochastic Gradient DescentSamuel L. Smith, Benoit Dherin, David G. T. Barrett, Soham DeICLR 2021 · 235 citations
- Sharpened Generalization Bounds based on Conditional Mutual Information and an Application to Noisy, Iterative AlgorithmsMahdi Haghifam, Jeffrey Negrea, Ashish Khisti, Daniel M. Roy et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 124 citations
- Stochastic Training is Not Necessary for GeneralizationJonas Geiping, Micah Goldblum, Phillip Pope, Michael Moeller et al.ICLR 2022 · 83 citations
Related papers
- On Balancing Bias and Variance in Unsupervised Multi-Source-Free Domain AdaptationMaohao Shen, Yuheng Bu, Gregory W. WornellICML 2023 · 22 citations
- CASUAL: Conditional Support Alignment for Domain Adaptation with Label ShiftAnh T. Nguyen, Lam Tran, Anh Tong, Tuan-Duy H. Nguyen et al.AAAI 2025 · 3 citations
- Understanding the Limits of Unsupervised Domain Adaptation via Data PoisoningAkshay Mehra, Bhavya Kailkhura, Pin-Yu Chen, Jihun HammNeurIPS 2021 · 30 citations
- Margin-aware Adversarial Domain Adaptation with Optimal TransportSofien Dhouib, Ievgen Redko, Carole LartizienICML 2020 · 17 citations
- Generalization Bounds for Out-of-distribution GeneralizationXin Zou, Xiuwen Gong, Weiwei LiuICML 2026 · 14 citations
