Robust Sparsification for Matroid Intersection with Applications
Chien-Chung Huang, François Sellier
Abstract
Matroid intersection is a classical optimization problem where, given two matroids over the same ground set, the goal is to find the largest common independent set. In this paper, we show that there exists a certain "sparsifer": a subset of elements, of size O(|S opt | • 1/ε), where S opt denotes the optimal solution, that is guaranteed to contain a 3/2 + ε approximation, while guaranteeing certain robustness properties. We call such a small subset a Density Constrained Subset (DCS), which is inspired by the Edge-Degree Constrained Subgraph (EDCS) [Bernstein and Stein, 2015], originally designed for the maximum cardinality matching problem in a graph. Our proof is constructive and hinges on a greedy decomposition of matroids, which we call the density-based decomposition. We show that this sparsifier has certain robustness properties that can be used in one-way communication and random-order streaming models.
Specifically, we use the DCS to design a one-way communication protocol for matroid intersection and obtain a 3/2 + ε approximation, using a message of size O(|S opt | • 1/ε). This matches the best achievable ratio for the one-way communication bipartite matching [Goel, Kapralov, and Khanna, 2012].
Moreover, the DCS can be used to design a streaming algorithm in the random-order streaming model requiring the space of O(|S opt | • poly(log(n), 1/ε)), where n is the size of the stream (the ground set of the matroids). Our algorithm guarantees a 3/2 + ε approximation in expectation and, when the size of S opt is not too small, with high probability. Prior to our work, the best approximation ratio of a streaming algorithm in the random-order streaming model was an expected 2 -δ for some small constant δ > 0 [Guruganesh and Singla, 2017].
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers2
- The Online Submodular Assignment ProblemDaniel Hathcock, Billy Jin, Kalen Patton, Sherry Sarkar et al.FOCS 2024 · 6 citations
- Tight Bounds for Maximum Weight Matroid Independent Set and Matching in the Zero Communication ModelIlan Doron-AradNeurIPS 2025
Builds on7
- The one-way communication complexity of submodular maximization with applications to streaming and robustnessMoran Feldman, Ashkan Norouzi-Fard, Ola Svensson, Rico ZenklusenSTOC 2020 · 32 citations
- Space Lower Bounds for Approximating Maximum Matching in the Edge Arrival ModelMichael KapralovSODA 2021 · 15 citations
- Approximate Maximum Matching in Random StreamsAlireza Farhadi, Mohammad Taghi Hajiaghayi, Tung Mai, Anup Rao et al.SODA 2020 · 14 citations
- New Trade-Offs for Fully Dynamic Matching via Hierarchical EDCSSoheil Behnezhad, Sanjeev KhannaSODA 2022 · 11 citations
- Sublinear Time Algorithms and Complexity of Approximate Maximum MatchingSoheil Behnezhad, Mohammad Roghani, Aviad RubinsteinSTOC 2023 · 9 citations
Related papers
- Bipartite Matching in Massive Graphs: A Tight Analysis of EDCSAmir Azarmehr, Soheil Behnezhad, Mohammad RoghaniICML 2024
- Better Approximation for Weighted k-Matroid IntersectionNeta Singer, Theophile ThierySTOC 2025
- Deletion Robust Submodular Maximization over MatroidsPaul Duetting, Federico Fusco, Silvio Lattanzi, Ashkan Norouzi-Fard et al.ICML 2022 · 20 citations
- Breaking the quadratic barrier for matroid intersectionJoakim Blikstad, Jan van den Brand, Sagnik Mukhopadhyay, Danupon NanongkaiSTOC 2021
- Maximizing Determinants under Matroid ConstraintsVivek Madan, Aleksandar Nikolov, Mohit Singh, Uthaipon TantipongpipatFOCS 2020 · 8 citations
