Space Lower Bounds for Approximating Maximum Matching in the Edge Arrival Model
Michael Kapralov
Abstract
The bipartite matching problem in the online and streaming settings has received a lot of attention recently. The classical vertex arrival setting, for which the celebrated Karp, Vazirani and Vazirani (KVV) algorithm achieves a 1 – 1/e approximation, is rather well understood: the 1 – 1/e approximation is optimal in both the online and semi-streaming setting, where the algorithm is constrained to use n · logO(1) n space. The more challenging the edge arrival model has seen significant progress recently in the online algorithms literature. For the strictly online model (no preemption) approximations better than trivial factor 1/2 have been ruled out [Gamlath et al'FOCS'19]. For the less restrictive online preemptive model a better than -approximation [Epstein et al'STACS'12] and even a better than -approximation[Huang et al'SODA'19] have been ruled out. The recent hardness results for online preemptive matching in the edge arrival model are based on the idea of stringing together multiple copies of a KVV hard instance using edge arrivals. In this paper, we show how to implement such constructions using ideas developed in the literature on Ruzsa-Szemerédi graphs. As a result, we show that any single pass streaming algorithm that approximates the maximum matching in a bipartite graph with n vertices to a factor better than requires n1+Ω(1/ log log n) » n logO(1) n space. This gives the first separation between the classical one sided vertex arrival setting and the edge arrival setting in the semi-streaming model.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9635fec8-1f0d-4ff1-8292-8e55aa5ad7efCited by top-tier papers17
- Fairness in Streaming Submodular Maximization over a Matroid ConstraintMarwa El Halabi, Federico Fusco, Ashkan Norouzi-Fard, Jakab Tardos et al.ICML 2023 · 15 citations
- Dynamic Algorithms for Maximum Matching SizeSoheil BehnezhadSODA 2023 · 14 citations
- On Regularity Lemma and Barriers in Streaming and Dynamic MatchingSepehr Assadi, Soheil Behnezhad, Sanjeev Khanna, Huan LiSTOC 2023 · 13 citations
- Dynamic Matching with Better-than-2 Approximation in Polylogarithmic Update TimeSayan Bhattacharya, Peter Kiss, Thatchaphol Saranurak, David WajcSODA 2023 · 11 citations
- Deterministic (1+ε)-approximate maximum matching with poly(1/ε) passes in the semi-streaming model and beyondManuela Fischer, Slobodan Mitrovic, Jara UittoSTOC 2022 · 11 citations
Builds on1
Related papers
- Hidden Permutations to the Rescue: Multi-Pass Streaming Lower Bounds for Approximate MatchingsSepehr Assadi, Janani SundaresanFOCS 2023 · 3 citations
- Approximate Maximum Matching in Random StreamsAlireza Farhadi, Mohammad Taghi Hajiaghayi, Tung Mai, Anup Rao et al.SODA 2020 · 14 citations
- Semi-streaming Matching in a Single Pass: A New Framework for Lower Bounds via BlueprintsSepehr Assadi, Max Jiang, Mars XiangSTOC 2026 · 4 citations
- An Unconditional Lower Bound for Two-Pass Streaming Algorithms for Maximum Matching ApproximationChristian Konrad, Kheeran K. NaiduSODA 2024 · 1 citation
- A Two-Pass (Conditional) Lower Bound for Semi-Streaming Maximum MatchingSepehr AssadiSODA 2022 · 7 citations
