Rarity Score : A New Metric to Evaluate the Uncommonness of Synthesized Images
Jiyeon Han, Hwanil Choi, Yunjey Choi, Junho Kim, Jung-Woo Ha, Jaesik Choi
Abstract
Evaluation metrics in image synthesis play a key role to measure performances of generative models. However, most metrics mainly focus on image fidelity. Existing diversity metrics are derived by comparing distributions, and thus they cannot quantify the diversity or rarity degree of each generated image. In this work, we propose a new evaluation metric, called `rarity score', to measure the individual rarity of each image synthesized by generative models. We first show empirical observation that common samples are close to each other and rare samples are far from each other in nearest-neighbor distances of feature space. We then use our metric to demonstrate that the extent to which different generative models produce rare images can be effectively compared. We also propose a method to compare rarities between datasets that share the same concept such as CelebA-HQ and FFHQ. Finally, we analyze the use of metrics in different designs of feature spaces to better understand the relationship between feature spaces and resulting sparse images. Code will be publicly available online for the research community.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1b6c97b0-9208-44db-b540-74ac87ef5ca0Cited by top-tier papers23
- Exposing flaws of generative model evaluation metrics and their unfair treatment of diffusion modelsGeorge Stein, Jesse C. Cresswell, Rasa Hosseinzadeh, Yi Sui et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 260 citations
- Don't Play Favorites: Minority Guidance for Diffusion ModelsSoobin Um, Suhyeon Lee, Jong Chul YeICLR 2024 · 37 citations
- Towards a Scalable Reference-Free Evaluation of Generative ModelsAzim Ospanov, Jingwei Zhang, Mohammad Jalali, Xuenan Cao et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 32 citations
- Refining Diffusion Planner for Reliable Behavior Synthesis by Automatic Detection of Infeasible PlansKyowoon Lee, Seongun Kim, Jaesik ChoiNeurIPS 2023 · 31 citations
- An Interpretable Evaluation of Entropy-based Novelty of Generative ModelsJingwei Zhang, Cheuk Ting Li, Farzan FarniaICML 2024 · 18 citations
Builds on19
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision TransformersMathilde Caron, Hugo Touvron, Ishan Misra, Hervé Jégou et al.ICCV 2021 · 8,921 citations
- Training Generative Adversarial Networks with Limited DataTero Karras, Miika Aittala, Janne Hellsten, Samuli Laine et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 2,345 citations
- Alias-Free Generative Adversarial NetworksTero Karras, Miika Aittala, Samuli Laine, Erik Härkönen et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 2,126 citations
- GANSpace: Discovering Interpretable GAN ControlsErik Härkönen, Aaron Hertzmann, Jaakko Lehtinen, Sylvain ParisNeurIPS 2020 · 1,049 citations
Related papers
- Anomaly Score: Evaluating Generative Models and Individual Generated Images Based on Complexity and VulnerabilityJaehui Hwang, Junghyuk Lee, Jong-Seok LeeCVPR 2024
- Reliable Fidelity and Diversity Metrics for Generative ModelsMuhammad Ferjad Naeem, Seong Joon Oh, Youngjung Uh, Yunjey Choi et al.ICML 2020 · 553 citations
- An Information-Theoretic Evaluation of Generative Models in Learning Multi-modal DistributionsMohammad Jalali, Cheuk Ting Li, Farzan FarniaNeurIPS 2023 · 46 citations
- Feature Likelihood Score: Evaluating the Generalization of Generative Models Using SamplesMarco Jiralerspong, Avishek Joey Bose, Ian Gemp, Chongli Qin et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 39 citations
- Diversity vs. Recognizability: Human-like generalization in one-shot generative modelsVictor Boutin, Lakshya Singhal, Xavier Thomas, Thomas SerreNeurIPS 2022 · 13 citations
