"Why is this misleading?": Detecting News Headline Hallucinations with Explanations
Jiaming Shen, Jialu Liu, Daniel Finnie, Negar Rahmati, Mike Bendersky, Marc Najork
Abstract
Automatic headline generation enables users to comprehend ongoing news events promptly and has recently become an important task in web mining and natural language processing. With the growing need for news headline generation, we argue that the hallucination issue, namely the generated headlines being not supported by the original news stories, is a critical challenge for the deployment of this feature in web-scale systems Meanwhile, due to the infrequency of hallucination cases and the requirement of careful reading for raters to reach the correct consensus, it is difficult to acquire a large dataset for training a model to detect such hallucinations through human curation. In this work, we present a new framework named ExHalder to address this challenge for headline hallucination detection. ExHalder adapts the knowledge from public natural language inference datasets into the news domain and learns to generate natural language sentences to explain the hallucination detection results. To evaluate the model performance, we carefully collect a dataset with more than six thousand labeled ⟨article, headline⟩ pairs. Extensive experiments on this dataset and another six public ones demonstrate that ExHalder can identify hallucinated headlines accurately and justifies its predictions with human-readable natural language explanations. CCS CONCEPTS • Computing methodologies → Natural language processing; • Information systems → Web applications.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1b4c2b93-71b9-4baf-a44b-d4bb814367e3Cited by top-tier papers3
- Automated Justification Production for Claim Veracity in Fact Checking: A Survey on Architectures and ApproachesIslam Eldifrawi, Shengrui Wang, Amine TrabelsiACL 2024 · 4 citations
- RAGTruth: A Hallucination Corpus for Developing Trustworthy Retrieval-Augmented Language ModelsCheng Niu, Yuanhao Wu, Juno Zhu, Siliang Xu et al.ACL 2024
- Explanation-aware Soft Ensemble Empowers Large Language Model In-context LearningYue Yu, Jiaming Shen, Tianqi Liu, Zhen Qin et al.ACL 2024
Builds on9
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- PEGASUS: Pre-training with Extracted Gap-sentences for Abstractive SummarizationJingqing Zhang, Yao Zhao, Mohammad Saleh, Peter J. LiuICML 2020 · 2,453 citations
- Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language UnderstandingYixin Nie, Adina Williams, Emily Dinan, Mohit Bansal et al.ACL 2020 · 602 citations
- Asking and Answering Questions to Evaluate the Factual Consistency of SummariesAlex Wang, Kyunghyun Cho, Mike LewisACL 2020 · 317 citations
- Generating Representative Headlines for News StoriesXiaotao Gu, Yuning Mao, Jiawei Han, Jialu Liu et al.WWW 2020 · 77 citations
Related papers
- PHPFND: Detecting Fake News via Post-Hoc Processing of LLMs HallucinationJinke Ma, Jiachen Ma, Wei Zhang, Yong LiuAAAI 2026
- K-HALU: Multiple Answer Korean Hallucination Benchmark for Large Language ModelsJaehyung Seo, Heuiseok LimICLR 2025
- The Dawn After the Dark: An Empirical Study on Factuality Hallucination in Large Language ModelsJunyi Li, Jie Chen, Ruiyang Ren, Xiaoxue Cheng et al.ACL 2024 · 49 citations
- Hallucinations in LLM-Based Code Summarization: Unveiling, Detection, and MitigationGuanghua Wan, Yuanning Feng, Yao Wan, Zhaoyang Chu et al.FSE 2026
- Importance-Aware Learning for Neural Headline EditingQingyang Wu, Lei Li, Hao Zhou, Ying Zeng et al.AAAI 2020 · 17 citations
