K-HALU: Multiple Answer Korean Hallucination Benchmark for Large Language Models
Jaehyung Seo, Heuiseok Lim
Abstract
Recent researchers and companies have been developing large language models (LLMs) specifically designed for particular purposes and have achieved significant advancements in various natural language processing tasks. However, LLMs are still prone to generating hallucinations-results that are unfaithful or inconsistent with the given input. As a result, the need for datasets to evaluate and demonstrate the hallucination detection capabilities of LLMs is increasingly recognized. Nonetheless, the Korean NLP community lacks publicly available benchmark datasets demonstrating the faithfulness of knowledge-based information. Furthermore, the few existing datasets that evaluate hallucination are limited in their access to the entire dataset, restricting detailed analysis beyond simple scoring, and are based on translated English knowledge. To address these challenges, we introduce K-HALU 1 , a Korean benchmark designed to evaluate LLMs' hallucination detection in Korean. This benchmark contains seven domains, considering the faithfulness of statements based on knowledge documents compiled from Korean news, magazines, and books. For more strict evaluation, 40% of the dataset is structured as multiple-answer questions, requiring models to select all possible correct answers from the given options. Our empirical results show that opensource LLMs still struggle with hallucination detection in Korean knowledge, emphasizing the need for a more detailed analysis of their limitations.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on21
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human FalsehoodsStephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain EvansACL 2022 · 3,228 citations
- Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language ModelsXuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V. Le et al.ICLR 2023 · 681 citations
Related papers
- The Dawn After the Dark: An Empirical Study on Factuality Hallucination in Large Language ModelsJunyi Li, Jie Chen, Ruiyang Ren, Xiaoxue Cheng et al.ACL 2024 · 49 citations
- How Much Do LLMs Hallucinate across Languages? On Realistic Multilingual Estimation of LLM HallucinationSaad Obaid ul Islam, Anne Lauscher, Goran GlavasEMNLP 2025
- CogniBench: A Legal-inspired Framework and Dataset for Assessing Cognitive Faithfulness of Large Language ModelsXiaqiang Tang, Jian Li, Keyu Hu, Nan Du et al.ACL 2025 · 3 citations
- Rethinking Evaluation for LLM Hallucination Detection: A Desiderata, A New RAG-based Benchmark, New InsightsWenbo Chen, Veena Padmanabhan, Tootiya Giyahchi, Elaine Wong et al.ACL 2026 · 1 citation
- Can Knowledge Editing Really Correct Hallucinations?Baixiang Huang, Canyu Chen, Xiongxiao Xu, Ali Payani et al.ICLR 2025
