Order-Revealing Encryption: New Constructions, Applications, and Lower Bounds
Kevin Lewi, David J. Wu
Abstract
In the last few years, there has been significant interest in developing methods to search over encrypted data. In the case of range queries, a simple solution is to encrypt the contents of the database using an order-preserving encryption (OPE) scheme (i.e., an encryption scheme that supports comparisons over encrypted values). However, Naveed et al. (CCS 2015) recently showed that OPE-encrypted databases are extremely vulnerable to "inference attacks." In this work, we consider a related primitive called orderrevealing encryption (ORE), which is a generalization of OPE that allows for stronger security. We begin by constructing a new ORE scheme for small message spaces which achieves the "best-possible" notion of security for ORE. Next, we introduce a "domain-extension" technique and apply it to our small-message-space ORE. While our domain-extension technique does incur a loss in security, the resulting ORE scheme we obtain is more secure than all existing (stateless and non-interactive) OPE and ORE schemes which are practical. All of our constructions rely only on symmetric primitives. As part of our analysis, we also give a tight lower bound for OPE and show that no efficient OPE scheme can satisfy best-possible security if the message space contains just three messages. Thus, achieving strong notions of security for even small message spaces requires moving beyond OPE. Finally, we examine the properties of our new ORE scheme and show how to use it to construct an efficient range query protocol that is robust against the inference attacks of Naveed et al. We also give a full implementation of our new ORE scheme, and show that not only is our scheme more secure than existing OPE schemes, it is also faster: encrypting a 32-bit integer requires just 55 microseconds, which is more than 65 times faster than existing OPE schemes.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1b077b45-bbed-42f3-ad04-506e178f524aCited by top-tier papers13
- Leakage-Abuse Attacks against Order-Revealing EncryptionPaul Grubbs, Kevin Sekniqi, Vincent Bindschaedler, Muhammad Naveed et al.S&P 2017 · 204 citations
- Improved Reconstruction Attacks on Encrypted Data Using Range Query LeakageMarie-Sarah Lacharité, Brice Minaud, Kenneth G. PatersonS&P 2018 · 183 citations
- Data Recovery on Encrypted Databases with k-Nearest Neighbor Query LeakageEvgenios M. Kornaropoulos, Charalampos Papamanthou, Roberto TamassiaS&P 2019 · 92 citations
- Balancing storage efficiency and data confidentiality with tunable encrypted deduplicationJingwei Li, Zuoru Yang, Yanjing Ren, Patrick P. C. Lee et al.EuroSys 2020 · 46 citations
- Frequency-Hiding Order-Preserving Encryption with Small Client StorageDongjie Li, Siyi Lv, Yanyu Huang, Yijing Liu et al.VLDB 2021 · 20 citations
Builds on1
Related papers
- Strengthening Order Preserving Encryption with Differential PrivacyAmrita Roy Chowdhury, Bolin Ding, Somesh Jha, Weiran Liu et al.CCS 2022 · 9 citations
- What Else is Revealed by Order-Revealing Encryption?F. Betül Durak, Thomas M. DuBuisson, David CashCCS 2016 · 128 citations
- Frequency-revealing attacks against Frequency-hiding Order-preserving EncryptionXinle Cao, Jian Liu, Yongsheng Shen, Xiaohua Ye et al.VLDB 2023 · 9 citations
- Generic Attacks on Secure Outsourced DatabasesGeorgios Kellaris, George Kollios, Kobbi Nissim, Adam O'NeillCCS 2016 · 327 citations
- Differentially Private Access in Encrypted Search: Achieving Privacy at a Small Cost?Daniel Pöllmann, Tianxin TangCCS 2025
