From Generative to Episodic: Sample-Efficient Replicable Reinforcement Learning
Max Hopkins, Sihan Liu, Christopher Ye, Yuichi Yoshida
Abstract
The epidemic failure of replicability across empirical science and machine learning has recently motivated the formal study of replicable learning algorithms [Impagliazzo et al. (2022) ]. In batch settings where data comes from a fixed i.i.d. source (e.g., hypothesis testing, supervised learning), the design of data-efficient replicable algorithms is now more or less understood. In contrast, there remain significant gaps in our knowledge for control settings like reinforcement learning where an agent must interact directly with a shifting environment. Karbasi et. al show that with access to a generative model of an environment with S states and A actions (the RL 'batch setting'), replicably learning a near-optimal policy costs only Õ(S 2 A 2 ) samples. On the other hand, the best upper bound without a generative model jumps to Õ(S 7 A 7 ) [Eaton et al. (2024)] due to the substantial difficulty of environment exploration. This gap raises a key question in the broader theory of replicability: Is replicable exploration inherently more expensive than batch learning? Is sample-efficient replicable RL even possible? In this work, we (nearly) resolve this problem (for low-horizon tabular MDPs): exploration is not a significant barrier to replicable learning! Our main result is a replicable RL algorithm on Õ(S 2 A) samples, bridging the gap between the generative and episodic settings. We complement this with a matching Ω(S 2 A) lower bound in the generative setting (under the common parallel sampling assumption) and an unconditional lower bound in the episodic setting of Ω(S 2 ) showcasing the near-optimality of our algorithm with respect to the state space S.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1a845281-3fb6-43fd-b08f-e390d6097d11Cited by top-tier papers2
- Replicable Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function ApproximationEric Eaton, Marcel Hussing, Michael Kearns, Aaron Roth et al.ICLR 2026 · 6 citations
- Replicable Reinforcement LearningEric Eaton, Marcel Hussing, Michael Kearns, Jessica SorrellNeurIPS 2023 · 3 citations
Builds on19
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Reward-Free Exploration for Reinforcement LearningChi Jin, Akshay Krishnamurthy, Max Simchowitz, Tiancheng YuICML 2020 · 226 citations
- Private Reinforcement Learning with PAC and Regret GuaranteesGiuseppe Vietri, Borja Balle, Akshay Krishnamurthy, Zhiwei Steven WuICML 2020 · 70 citations
- Task-agnostic Exploration in Reinforcement LearningXuezhou Zhang, Yuzhe Ma, Adish SinglaNeurIPS 2020 · 56 citations
- User-Level Differentially Private Learning via Correlated SamplingBadih Ghazi, Ravi Kumar, Pasin ManurangsiNeurIPS 2021 · 45 citations
Related papers
- Replicability in Reinforcement LearningAmin Karbasi, Grigoris Velegkas, Lin Yang, Felix ZhouNeurIPS 2023 · 28 citations
- Towards Deployment-Efficient Reinforcement Learning: Lower Bound and OptimalityJiawei Huang, Jinglin Chen, Li Zhao, Tao Qin et al.ICLR 2022 · 32 citations
- Provably Efficient Exploration for Reinforcement Learning Using Unsupervised LearningFei Feng, Ruosong Wang, Wotao Yin, Simon S. Du et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 13 citations
- Exponential Lower Bounds for Batch Reinforcement Learning: Batch RL can be Exponentially Harder than Online RLAndrea ZanetteICML 2021 · 75 citations
- Agnostic Reinforcement Learning with Low-Rank MDPs and Rich ObservationsAyush Sekhari, Christoph Dann, Mehryar Mohri, Yishay Mansour et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 15 citations
