Exponential Lower Bounds for Batch Reinforcement Learning: Batch RL can be Exponentially Harder than Online RL
Andrea Zanette
Abstract
Several practical applications of reinforcement learning involve an agent learning from past data without the possibility of further exploration. Often these applications require us to 1) identify a near optimal policy or to 2) estimate the value of a target policy. For both tasks we derive exponential information-theoretic lower bounds in discounted infinite horizon MDPs with a linear function representation for the action value function even if 1) realizability holds, 2) the batch algorithm observes the exact reward and transition functions, and 3) the batch algorithm is given the best a priori data distribution for the problem class. Furthermore, if the dataset does not come from policy rollouts then the lower bounds hold even if the action-value function of every policy admits a linear representation. If the objective is to find a near-optimal policy, we discover that these hard instances are easily solved by an online algorithm, showing that there exist RL problems where batch RL is exponentially harder than online RL even under the most favorable batch data distribution. In other words, online exploration is critical to enable sample efficient RL with function approximation. A second corollary is the exponential separation between finite and infinite horizon batch problems under our assumptions. On a technical level, this work introduces a new `oracle + batch algorithm' framework to prove lower bounds that hold for every distribution, and automatically recovers traditional fixed distribution lower bounds as a special case. Finally this work helps formalize the issue known as deadly triad and explains that the bootstrapping problem is potentially more severe than the extrapolation issue for RL because unlike the latter, bootstrapping cannot be mitigated by adding more samples.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b6193069-013c-4358-bbad-5013c3c4a0f2Cited by top-tier papers35
- Bridging Offline Reinforcement Learning and Imitation Learning: A Tale of PessimismParia Rashidinejad, Banghua Zhu, Cong Ma, Jiantao Jiao et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 373 citations
- Bellman-consistent Pessimism for Offline Reinforcement LearningTengyang Xie, Ching-An Cheng, Nan Jiang, Paul Mineiro et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 339 citations
- Offline RL Without Off-Policy EvaluationDavid Brandfonbrener, Will Whitney, Rajesh Ranganath, Joan BrunaNeurIPS 2021 · 217 citations
- Towards Instance-Optimal Offline Reinforcement Learning with PessimismMing Yin, Yu-Xiang WangNeurIPS 2021 · 93 citations
- Mitigating Covariate Shift in Imitation Learning via Offline Data With Partial CoverageJonathan D. Chang, Masatoshi Uehara, Dhruv Sreenivas, Rahul Kidambi et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 90 citations
Builds on12
- Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with Value-Targeted RegressionAlex Ayoub, Zeyu Jia, Csaba Szepesvári, Mengdi Wang et al.ICML 2020 · 324 citations
- Learning Near Optimal Policies with Low Inherent Bellman ErrorAndrea Zanette, Alessandro Lazaric, Mykel J. Kochenderfer, Emma BrunskillICML 2020 · 238 citations
- Learning with Good Feature Representations in Bandits and in RL with a Generative ModelTor Lattimore, Csaba Szepesvári, Gellért WeiszICML 2020 · 181 citations
- What are the Statistical Limits of Offline RL with Linear Function Approximation?Ruosong Wang, Dean P. Foster, Sham M. KakadeICLR 2021 · 172 citations
- Minimax-Optimal Off-Policy Evaluation with Linear Function ApproximationYaqi Duan, Zeyu Jia, Mengdi WangICML 2020 · 161 citations
Related papers
- Towards Deployment-Efficient Reinforcement Learning: Lower Bound and OptimalityJiawei Huang, Jinglin Chen, Li Zhao, Tao Qin et al.ICLR 2022 · 32 citations
- On the Role of General Function Approximation in Offline Reinforcement LearningChenjie Mao, Qiaosheng Zhang, Zhen Wang, Xuelong LiICLR 2024 · 3 citations
- Continuous Doubly Constrained Batch Reinforcement LearningRasool Fakoor, Jonas Mueller, Kavosh Asadi, Pratik Chaudhari et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 37 citations
- Average-Reward Off-Policy Policy Evaluation with Function ApproximationShangtong Zhang, Yi Wan, Richard S. Sutton, Shimon WhitesonICML 2021 · 39 citations
- Near Optimal Reward-Free Reinforcement LearningZihan Zhang, Simon S. Du, Xiangyang JiICML 2021 · 15 citations
