Implicit meta-learning may lead language models to trust more reliable sources
Dmitrii Krasheninnikov, Egor Krasheninnikov, Bruno Kacper Mlodozeniec, Tegan Maharaj, David Krueger
Abstract
We demonstrate that LLMs may learn indicators of document usefulness and modulate their updates accordingly. We introduce random strings ("tags") as indicators of usefulness in a synthetic fine-tuning dataset. Fine-tuning on this dataset leads to implicit meta-learning (IML): in further fine-tuning, the model updates to make more use of text that is tagged as useful. We perform a thorough empirical investigation of this phenomenon, finding (among other things) that (i) it occurs in both pretrained LLMs and those trained from scratch, as well as on a vision task, and (ii) larger models and smaller batch sizes tend to give more IML. We also use probing to examine how IML changes the way models store knowledge in their parameters. Finally, we reflect on what our results might imply about capabilities, risks, and controllability of future AI systems. Our code can be found at https://github.com/krasheninnikov/internalization.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1a7a6d35-99de-402f-921a-042e9f41c287Cited by top-tier papers7
- Alignment Pretraining: AI Discourse Causes Self-Fulfilling (Mis)alignmentCameron Tice, Puria Radmard, Samuel Ratnam, Andy Kim et al.ICML 2026 · 22 citations
- Fresh in memory: Training-order recency is linearly encoded in language model activationsDmitrii Krasheninnikov, Richard E. Turner, David KruegerICLR 2026 · 5 citations
- Programming by Backprop: An Instruction is Worth 100 Examples When Finetuning LLMsJonathan Cook, Silvia Sapora, Arash Ahmadian, Akbir Khan et al.ICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- Tell me about yourself: LLMs are aware of their learned behaviorsJan Betley, Xuchan Bao, Martín Soto, Anna Sztyber-Betley et al.ICLR 2025 · 2 citations
- On Targeted Manipulation and Deception when Optimizing LLMs for User FeedbackMarcus Williams, Micah Carroll, Adhyyan Narang, Constantin Weisser et al.ICLR 2025
Builds on22
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- A ConvNet for the 2020sZhuang Liu, Hanzi Mao, Chao-Yuan Wu, Christoph Feichtenhofer et al.CVPR 2022 · 6,782 citations
- Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-shot Performance of Language ModelsZihao Zhao, Eric Wallace, Shi Feng, Dan Klein et al.ICML 2021 · 1,843 citations
- Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and ScalingStella Biderman, Hailey Schoelkopf, Quentin Gregory Anthony, Herbie Bradley et al.ICML 2023 · 1,822 citations
- Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order SensitivityYao Lu, Max Bartolo, Alastair Moore, Sebastian Riedel et al.ACL 2022 · 1,494 citations
Related papers
- Beyond URLs: Metadata Diversity and Position for Efficient LLM PretrainingDongyang Fan, Diba Hashemi, Sai Praneeth Karimireddy, Martin JaggiICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- Fine-Tuning or Retrieval? Comparing Knowledge Injection in LLMsOded Ovadia, Menachem Brief, Moshik Mishaeli, Oren ElishaEMNLP 2024 · 89 citations
- Layer by Layer: Uncovering Where Multi-Task Learning Happens in Instruction-Tuned Large Language ModelsZheng Zhao, Yftah Ziser, Shay B. CohenEMNLP 2024
- An Emulator for Fine-tuning Large Language Models using Small Language ModelsEric Mitchell, Rafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Chelsea Finn et al.ICLR 2024 · 68 citations
- I Learn Better If You Speak My Language: Understanding the Superior Performance of Fine-Tuning Large Language Models with LLM-Generated ResponsesXuan Ren, Biao Wu, Lingqiao LiuEMNLP 2024 · 1 citation
