Where to Improve? A Systematic Evaluation of Sampling Parameters for Pressure Sensor Matrix
Fangting Xie, Zhen Liang, Ziyu Wu, Dongquan Zhang, Mingjie Zhao, Quan Wan, Changhai Ma, Jiayue Yuan, Siqi Lei, Xiaohui Cai
Abstract
The pressure sensor matrix shows strong potential in ubiquitous computing, such as human-computer interaction and human activity recognition. However, a considerable gap remains between the diverse and often casually configured laboratory prototypes currently in use and practical systems designed for cost-effectiveness. A critical factor underlying this gap is the lack of theoretical guidance for selecting system sampling parameters, namely, sampling frequency, spatial resolution, and bit depth. In the absence of such guidance, parameter selection tends to be arbitrary. To address this issue, we systematically select representative datasets in the field of pressure sensing, and propose a general multi-level data quality assessment framework based on downsampling. Experiments on 6 datasets across 5 device types show that downstream task performance can be effectively modeled using a logistic growth function, and reveal the following insights: (1) Spatial resolution is the primary bottleneck in most systems, with an ideal value exceeding 200 sensors/m. This highlights a critical direction for improving sensor and electronics design. (2) Bit depth is sufficient, with a recommended value of 8 bit or higher. This suggests that data compression could serve as a promising direction for reducing bandwidth and computational costs in future systems. (3) Sampling frequency appears to be relatively less influential, possibly due to the limited consideration of dynamic activities in existing datasets. This finding underscores the need for the research community to develop datasets that specifically target such activities. In summary, our study provides preliminary theoretical guidance for selecting sampling parameters for the pressure sensor matrix and identifies clear directions for future improvements, helping pave the way from laboratory prototypes to practical applications.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Related papers
- Quali-Mat: Evaluating the Quality of Execution in Body-Weight Exercises with a Pressure Sensitive Sports MatBo Zhou, Sungho Suh, Vítor Fortes Rey, Carlos Andres Velez Altamirano et al.UbiComp 2022 · 20 citations
- Deriving Effective Human Activity Recognition Systems through Objective Task Complexity AssessmentShruthi K. Hiremath, Thomas PlötzUbiComp 2021 · 11 citations
- PressTrack-HMR: Pressure-Based Top-Down Multi-Person Global Human Mesh RecoveryJiayue Yuan, Fangting Xie, Guangwen Ouyang, Changhai Ma et al.AAAI 2026
- SenseCollect: We Need Efficient Ways to Collect On-body Sensor-based Human Activity Data!Wenqiang Chen, Shupei Lin, Elizabeth Thompson, John A. StankovicUbiComp 2021 · 34 citations
- AdaSense: Adaptive Low-Power Sensing and Activity Recognition for Wearable DevicesMarina Neseem, Jon Nelson, Sherief RedaDAC 2020 · 6 citations
