Deriving Effective Human Activity Recognition Systems through Objective Task Complexity Assessment
Shruthi K. Hiremath, Thomas Plötz
Abstract
Research in sensor based human activity recognition (HAR) has been a core concern of the mobile and ubiquitous computing community. Sophisticated systems have been developed with the main view on applications of HAR methods in research settings. This work addresses a related yet practically different problem that mainly focuses on users of HAR technology. We acknowledge that practitioners from outside the core HAR research community are motivated to employ HAR methods for practical deployments. Even though standard processing approaches exist, arguably, often times substantial modifications are necessary to derive effective analysis systems. It is not always clear a-priori how challenging a HAR task actually is and what dimensions of an analysis pipeline are crucial for successful automated assessments. In practice this can lead to disappointing results or disproportionate efforts that have to be invested into the optimization of data analysis pipelines, that were supposed to work "out of the box". We present a framework for the objective complexity assessment of HAR tasks that directly supports practitioners' decision making of whether and how to employ HAR for their deployments. We map a HAR task onto a vectorial representation that allows us to analyse the inherent challenges of the task and to draw conclusions through similarity analysis with regards to existing tasks. We validate our complexity assessment framework on 23 HAR datasets and derive a data-driven categorization of human activity recognition. We demonstrate how our objective analysis can be used to inform the deployment of HAR systems in practical scenarios.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get 9a619a2b-dbc8-46ca-924b-ae4373c7dbdcCited by top-tier papers2
- Assessing the State of Self-Supervised Human Activity Recognition Using WearablesHarish Haresamudram, Irfan Essa, Thomas PlötzUbiComp 2022 · 104 citations
- Layout-Agnostic Human Activity Recognition in Smart Homes through Textual Descriptions Of Sensor Triggers (TDOST)Megha Thukral, Sourish Gunesh Dhekane, Shruthi K. Hiremath, Harish Haresamudram et al.UbiComp 2025 · 19 citations
Related papers
- Past, Present, and Future of Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition Using Wearables: A Surveying Tutorial on a Still Challenging TaskHarish Haresamudram, Chi Ian Tang, Sungho Suh, Paul Lukowicz et al.UbiComp 2025 · 31 citations
- Foundation Models Defining A New Era In Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition: A Survey And OutlookSizhen Bian, Mengxi Liu, Lala Shakti Swarup Ray, Bo Zhou et al.UbiComp 2026 · 2 citations
- Contrastive Predictive Coding for Human Activity RecognitionHarish Haresamudram, Irfan A. Essa, Thomas PlötzUbiComp 2021 · 149 citations
- Meta-HAR: Federated Representation Learning for Human Activity RecognitionChenglin Li, Di Niu, Bei Jiang, Xiao Zuo et al.WWW 2021 · 129 citations
- Bootstrapping Human Activity Recognition Systems for Smart Homes from ScratchShruthi K. Hiremath, Yasutaka Nishimura, Sonia Chernova, Thomas PlötzUbiComp 2022 · 37 citations
