EMNLP Findings2024
Monotonic Paraphrasing Improves Generalization of Language Model Prompting
Qin Liu, Fei Wang, Nan Xu, Tianyi Yan, Tao Meng, Muhao Chen
Abstract
Performance of large language models (LLMs) may vary with different prompts or instructions for even the same task. One commonly recognized factor for this phenomenon is the model's familiarity with the given prompt or instruction, which is typically estimated by its perplexity. However, finding the prompt with the lowest perplexity is challenging, given the enormous space of possible prompting phrases. In this paper, we propose monotonic paraphrasing (MONOPARA), an end-to-end decoding strategy that paraphrases given prompts or instructions into their lower perplexity counterparts based on an ensemble of a paraphrase LM for prompt (or instruction) rewriting, and a target LM (i.e. the prompt or instruction executor) that constrains the generation for lower perplexity. The ensemble decoding process can efficiently paraphrase the original prompt without altering its semantic meaning, while monotonically decreasing the perplexity of each generation as calculated by the target LM. We explore in detail both greedy and search-based decoding as two alternative decoding schemes of MONOPARA. Notably, MONOPARA does not require any training and can monotonically lower the perplexity of the paraphrased prompt or instruction, leading to improved performance of zero-shot LM prompting as evaluated on a wide selection of tasks. In addition, MONOPARA is also shown to effectively improve LMs' generalization on perturbed and unseen task instructions. 1
Ask Lune
Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.
Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.
Lune answers from
the full paper · 4 top-tier papers that cite it · related work
Free to start. No credit card required.
Cited by top-tier papers4
- Self-Harmony: Learning to Harmonize Self-Supervision and Self-Play in Test-Time Reinforcement LearningRu Wang, Wei Huang, Qi Cao, Yusuke Iwasawa et al.ICLR 2026 · 9 citations
- PRISON: Unmasking the Criminal Potential of Large Language ModelsXinyi Wu, Geng Hong, Pei Chen, Yueyue Chen et al.ICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- Same Question, Different Words: A Latent Adversarial Framework for Prompt RobustnessTingchen Fu, Fazl BarezEMNLP 2025
- SudoLM: Learning Access Control of Parametric Knowledge with Authorization AlignmentQin Liu, Fei Wang, Chaowei Xiao, Muhao ChenACL 2025
Builds on32
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTTianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger et al.ICLR 2020 · 8,443 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task GeneralizationVictor Sanh, Albert Webson, Colin Raffel, Stephen H. Bach et al.ICLR 2022 · 1,976 citations
Related papers
- Demystifying Prompts in Language Models via Perplexity EstimationHila Gonen, Srini Iyer, Terra Blevins, Noah A. Smith et al.EMNLP Findings 2023 · 109 citations
- M-Ped: Multi-Prompt Ensemble Decoding for Large Language ModelsJiaxin Guo, Daimeng Wei, Yuanchang Luo, Hengchao Shang et al.EMNLP Findings 2025
- Reflective Decoding: Beyond Unidirectional Generation with Off-the-Shelf Language ModelsPeter West, Ximing Lu, Ari Holtzman, Chandra Bhagavatula et al.ACL 2021
- Evaluating the Zero-shot Robustness of Instruction-tuned Language ModelsJiuding Sun, Chantal Shaib, Byron C. WallaceICLR 2024 · 75 citations
- "Well, Keep Thinking": Enhancing LLM Reasoning with Adaptive Injection DecodingHyunbin Jin, Je Won Yeom, Seunghyun Bae, Taesup KimACL Findings 2025 · 1 citation
