A Unified Approach to Memory-Sample Tradeoffs for Detecting Planted Structures
Sumegha Garg, Jabari Hastings, Chirag Pabbaraju, Vatsal Sharan
Abstract
We present a unified framework for proving memory lower bounds for multi‐pass streaming algorithms that detect planted structures. Planted structures — such as cliques or bicliques in graphs, and sparse signals in high-dimensional data — arise in numerous applications, and our framework yields multi-pass memory lower bounds for many such fundamental settings. We show memory lower bounds for the planted k-biclique detection problem in random bipartite graphs and for detecting sparse Gaussian means. We also show the first memory-sample tradeoffs for the sparse principal component analysis (PCA) problem in the spiked covariance model. For all these problems to which we apply our unified framework, we obtain bounds which are nearly tight in the low, O(logn) memory regime. We also leverage our bounds to establish new multi-pass streaming lower bounds, in the vertex arrival model, for two well-studied graph streaming problems: approximating the size of the largest biclique and approximating the maximum density of bounded-size subgraphs. To show these bounds, we study a general distinguishing problem over matrices, where the goal is to distinguish a null distribution from one that plants an outlier distribution over a random submatrix. Our analysis builds on a new distributed data processing inequality that provides sufficient conditions for memory hardness in terms of the likelihood ratio between the averaged planted and null distributions. This result generalizes the inequality of [Braverman et al., STOC 2016] and may be of independent interest. The inequality enables us to measure information cost under the null distribution – a key step for applying subsequent direct-sum-type arguments and incorporating the multi-pass information cost framework of [Braverman et al., STOC 2024]. Finally, to instantiate our framework in concrete settings, we derive bounds on the likelihood ratio between the planted and null distributions using careful truncations.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 19820217-a981-463e-8985-717c7376db8dBuilds on8
- All-or-nothing statistical and computational phase transitions in sparse spiked matrix estimationJean Barbier, Nicolas Macris, Cynthia RushNeurIPS 2020 · 42 citations
- Space Lower Bounds for Approximating Maximum Matching in the Edge Arrival ModelMichael KapralovSODA 2021 · 15 citations
- The Coin Problem with Applications to Data StreamsMark Braverman, Sumegha Garg, David P. WoodruffFOCS 2020 · 14 citations
- Oja's Algorithm for Streaming Sparse PCASyamantak Kumar, Purnamrita SarkarNeurIPS 2024 · 13 citations
- Sparse PCA: Algorithms, Adversarial Perturbations and CertificatesTommaso d'Orsi, Pravesh K. Kothari, Gleb Novikov, David SteurerFOCS 2020 · 13 citations
Related papers
- Graph streaming lower bounds for parameter estimation and property testing via a streaming XOR lemmaSepehr Assadi, Vishvajeet NSTOC 2021 · 12 citations
- A New Information Complexity Measure for Multi-pass Streaming with ApplicationsMark Braverman, Sumegha Garg, Qian Li, Shuo Wang et al.STOC 2024
- Multi-Pass Streaming Lower Bounds for Approximating Max-CutYumou Fei, Dor Minzer, Shuo WangFOCS 2025 · 10 citations
- Multi-Pass Graph Streaming Lower Bounds for Cycle Counting, MAX-CUT, Matching Size, and Other ProblemsSepehr Assadi, Gillat Kol, Raghuvansh R. Saxena, Huacheng YuFOCS 2020 · 19 citations
- Streaming Lower Bounds and Asymmetric Set-DisjointnessShachar Lovett, Jiapeng ZhangFOCS 2023 · 3 citations
