WINNIE : Fuzzing Windows Applications with Harness Synthesis and Fast Cloning
Jinho Jung, Stephen Tong, Hong Hu, Jungwon Lim, Yonghwi Jin, Taesoo Kim
Abstract
—Fuzzing is an emerging technique to automatically validate programs and uncover bugs. It has been widely used to test many programs and has found thousands of security vulnerabilities. However, existing fuzzing efforts are mainly centered around Unix-like systems, as Windows imposes unique challenges for fuzzing: a closed-source ecosystem, the heavy use of graphical interfaces and the lack of fast process cloning machinery. In this paper, we propose two solutions to address the challenges Windows fuzzing faces. Our system, W INNIE , first tries to synthesize a harness for the application, a simple program that directly invokes target functions, based on sample executions. It then tests the harness, instead of the original complicated program, using an efficient implementation of fork on Windows. Using these techniques, W INNIE can bypass irrelevant GUI code to test logic deep within the application. We used W INNIE to fuzz 59 closed-source Windows binaries, and it successfully generated valid fuzzing harnesses for all of them. In our evaluation, W INNIE can support 2.2 × more programs than existing Windows fuzzers could, and identified 3.9 × more program states and achieved 26.6 × faster execution. In total, W INNIE found 61 unique bugs in 32 Windows binaries.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 197285be-c203-4580-9520-143fc867e5deCited by top-tier papers41
- Nyx-net: network fuzzing with incremental snapshotsSergej Schumilo, Cornelius Aschermann, Andrea Jemmett, Ali Abbasi et al.EuroSys 2022 · 76 citations
- SoK: Prudent Evaluation Practices for FuzzingMoritz Schloegel, Nils Bars, Nico Schiller, Lukas Bernhard et al.S&P 2024 · 69 citations
- APICraft: Fuzz Driver Generation for Closed-source SDK LibrariesCen Zhang, Xingwei Lin, Yuekang Li, Yinxing Xue et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 64 citations
- "Len or index or count, anything but v1": Predicting Variable Names in Decompilation Output with Transfer LearningKuntal Kumar Pal, Ati Priya Bajaj, Pratyay Banerjee, Audrey Dutcher et al.S&P 2024 · 30 citations
- How Effective Are They? Exploring Large Language Model Based Fuzz Driver GenerationCen Zhang, Yaowen Zheng, Mingqiang Bai, Yeting Li et al.ISSTA 2024 · 27 citations
Builds on18
- Coverage-based Greybox Fuzzing as Markov ChainMarcel Böhme, Van-Thuan Pham, Abhik RoychoudhuryCCS 2016 · 1,026 citations
- Driller: Augmenting Fuzzing Through Selective Symbolic ExecutionNick Stephens, John Grosen, Christopher Salls, Andrew Dutcher et al.NDSS 2016 · 1,021 citations
- Evaluating Fuzz TestingGeorge Klees, Andrew Ruef, Benji Cooper, Shiyi Wei et al.CCS 2018 · 753 citations
- VUzzer: Application-aware Evolutionary FuzzingSanjay Rawat, Vivek Jain, Ashish Kumar, Lucian Cojocar et al.NDSS 2017 · 700 citations
- Angora: Efficient Fuzzing by Principled SearchPeng Chen, Hao ChenS&P 2018 · 616 citations
Related papers
- No Linux, No Problem: Fast and Correct Windows Binary Fuzzing via Target-embedded SnapshottingLeo Stone, Rishi Ranjan, Stefan Nagy, Matthew HicksUSENIX Security 2023
- WildSync: Automated Fuzzing Harness Synthesis via Wild API Usage RecoveryWei-Cheng Wu, Stefan Nagy, Christophe HauserISSTA 2025 · 1 citation
- Designing New Operating Primitives to Improve Fuzzing PerformanceWen Xu, Sanidhya Kashyap, Changwoo Min, Taesoo KimCCS 2017 · 139 citations
- FuzzGen: Automatic Fuzzer GenerationKyriakos K. Ispoglou, Daniel Austin, Vishwath Mohan, Mathias PayerUSENIX Security 2020
- No Grammar, No Problem: Towards Fuzzing the Linux Kernel without System-Call DescriptionsAlexander Bulekov, Bandan Das, Stefan Hajnoczi, Manuel EgeleNDSS 2023
