Jigsaw-Puzzles: From Seeing to Understanding to Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
Zesen Lyu, Dandan Zhang, Wei Ye, Fangdi Li, Zhihang Jiang, Yao Yang
Abstract
Spatial reasoning is a core component of human cognition, enabling individuals to perceive, comprehend, and interact with the physical world. It relies on a nuanced understanding of spatial structures and inter-object relationships, serving as the foundation for complex reasoning and decision-making. To investigate whether current vision-language models (VLMs) exhibit similar capability, we introduce Jigsaw-Puzzles, a novel benchmark consisting of 1,100 carefully curated real-world images with high spatial complexity. Based on this dataset, we design five tasks to rigorously evaluate VLMs' spatial perception, structural understanding, and reasoning capabilities, while deliberately minimizing reliance on domainspecific knowledge to better isolate and assess the general spatial reasoning capability. We conduct a comprehensive evaluation across 24 state-of-the-art VLMs. The results show that even the strongest model, Gemini-2.5-Pro, achieves only 77.14% overall accuracy and performs particularly poorly on the Order Generation task, with only 30.00% accuracy, far below the 90%+ performance achieved by human participants. This persistent gap underscores the need for continued progress, positioning Jigsaw-Puzzles as a challenging and diagnostic benchmark for advancing spatial reasoning research in VLMs. Our project page is at https: //zesen01.github.io/jigsaw-puzzles .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1916894a-4ffb-46c1-af97-ddc859261216Cited by top-tier papers2
- Why Reinforcement Fine-Tuning Enables MLLMs Preserve Prior Knowledge Better: A Data PerspectiveZhihao Zhang, Qiaole Dong, Qi Zhang, Enyu Zhou et al.ICLR 2026 · 15 citations
- MentisOculi: Revealing the Limits of Reasoning with Mental ImageryJana Zeller, Thaddäus Wiedemer, Fanfei Li, Thomas Klein et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
Builds on8
- MMMU: A Massive Multi-Discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGIXiang Yue, Yuansheng Ni, Tianyu Zheng, Kai Zhang et al.CVPR 2024 · 213 citations
- Breaking Common Sense: WHOOPS! A Vision-and-Language Benchmark of Synthetic and Compositional ImagesNitzan Bitton Guetta, Yonatan Bitton, Jack Hessel, Ludwig Schmidt et al.ICCV 2023 · 92 citations
- VisualPuzzles: Decoupling Multimodal Reasoning Evaluation from Domain KnowledgeYueqi Song, Tianyue Ou, Yibo Kong, Zecheng Li et al.ICML 2026 · 44 citations
- Crossmodal-3600: A Massively Multilingual Multimodal Evaluation DatasetAshish V. Thapliyal, Jordi Pont-Tuset, Xi Chen, Radu SoricutEMNLP 2022 · 31 citations
- Redundancy Principles for MLLMs BenchmarksZicheng Zhang, Xiangyu Zhao, Xinyu Fang, Chunyi Li et al.ACL 2025 · 15 citations
Related papers
- SpatiaLab: Can Vision-Language Models Perform Spatial Reasoning in the Wild?Azmine Toushik Wasi, Wahid Faisal, Abdur Rahman, Mahfuz Ahmed Anik et al.ICLR 2026 · 13 citations
- Thinking in Structures: Evaluating Spatial Intelligence in Constraint-Governed SpacesChen Yang, Guanxin Lin, Youquan He, Peiyao Chen et al.ICML 2026
- Spatial-DISE: A Unified Benchmark for Evaluating Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language ModelsXinmiao Huang, Qisong He, Zhenglin Huang, Boxuan Wang et al.ICLR 2026 · 8 citations
- SpatiaLQA: A Benchmark for Evaluating Spatial Logical Reasoning in Vision-Language ModelsYuechen Xie, Xiaoyan Zhang, Yicheng Shan, Zhu Hao et al.CVPR 2026 · 8 citations
- OmniSpatial: Towards Comprehensive Spatial Reasoning Benchmark for Vision Language ModelsMengdi Jia, Zekun Qi, Shaochen Zhang, Wenyao Zhang et al.ICLR 2026 · 109 citations
