Harnessing the Power of Infinitely Wide Deep Nets on Small-data Tasks
Sanjeev Arora, Simon S. Du, Zhiyuan Li, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, Ruosong Wang, Dingli Yu
Abstract
Recent research shows that the following two models are equivalent: (a) infinitely wide neural networks (NNs) trained under l2 loss by gradient descent with infinitesimally small learning rate (b) kernel regression with respect to so-called Neural Tangent Kernels (NTKs) (Jacot et al., 2018). An efficient algorithm to compute the NTK, as well as its convolutional counterparts, appears in Arora et al. (2019a), which allowed studying performance of infinitely wide nets on datasets like CIFAR-10. However, super-quadratic running time of kernel methods makes them best suited for small-data tasks. We report results suggesting neural tangent kernels perform strongly on low-data tasks.
- On a standard testbed of classification/regression tasks from the UCI database, NTK SVM beats the previous gold standard, Random Forests (RF), and also the corresponding finite nets.
- On CIFAR-10 with 10 - 640 training samples, Convolutional NTK consistently beats ResNet-34 by 1% - 3%.
- On VOC07 testbed for few-shot image classification tasks on ImageNet with transfer learning (Goyal et al., 2019), replacing the linear SVM currently used with a Convolutional NTK SVM consistently improves performance.
- Comparing the performance of NTK with the finite-width net it was derived from, NTK behavior starts at lower net widths than suggested by theoretical analysis(Arora et al., 2019a). NTK's efficacy may trace to lower variance of output.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 18f47fac-d343-4331-a142-30bb899c8b9bCited by top-tier papers59
- Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in TrainingMansheej Paul, Surya Ganguli, Gintare Karolina DziugaiteNeurIPS 2021 · 806 citations
- How Neural Networks Extrapolate: From Feedforward to Graph Neural NetworksKeyulu Xu, Mozhi Zhang, Jingling Li, Simon Shaolei Du et al.ICLR 2021 · 364 citations
- Differentially Private Learning Needs Better Features (or Much More Data)Florian Tramèr, Dan BonehICLR 2021 · 325 citations
- Dataset Distillation with Infinitely Wide Convolutional NetworksTimothy Nguyen, Roman Novak, Lechao Xiao, Jaehoon LeeNeurIPS 2021 · 313 citations
- Dataset Meta-Learning from Kernel Ridge-RegressionTimothy Nguyen, Zhourong Chen, Jaehoon LeeICLR 2021 · 307 citations
Builds on1
Related papers
- Scaling Neural Tangent Kernels via Sketching and Random FeaturesAmir Zandieh, Insu Han, Haim Avron, Neta Shoham et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 42 citations
- On the Equivalence between Neural Network and Support Vector MachineYilan Chen, Wei Huang, Lam M. Nguyen, Tsui-Wei WengNeurIPS 2021 · 21 citations
- Fast Finite Width Neural Tangent KernelRoman Novak, Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, Samuel S. SchoenholzICML 2022 · 72 citations
- The Onset of Variance-Limited Behavior for Networks in the Lazy and Rich RegimesAlexander B. Atanasov, Blake Bordelon, Sabarish Sainathan, Cengiz PehlevanICLR 2023 · 4 citations
- Finite Versus Infinite Neural Networks: an Empirical StudyJaehoon Lee, Samuel S. Schoenholz, Jeffrey Pennington, Ben Adlam et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 245 citations
