Learning Preference Model for LLMs via Automatic Preference Data Generation
Shijia Huang, Jianqiao Zhao, Yanyang Li, Liwei Wang
Abstract
Despite the advanced capacities of the state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs), they suffer from issues of hallucination, stereotype, etc. Preference models play an important role in LLM alignment, yet training preference models predominantly rely on human-annotated data. This reliance limits their versatility and scalability. In this paper, we propose learning the preference model for LLMs via automatic preference data generation (AutoPM). Our approach involves both In-Breadth Data Generation, which elicits pairwise preference data from LLMs following the helpful-honest-harmless (HHH) criteria, and In-Depth Data Generation, which enriches the dataset with responses spanning a wide quality range. With HHH-guided preference data, our approach simultaneously enables the LLMs to learn human preferences and align with human values. Quantitative assessments on five benchmark datasets demonstrate the reliability and potential of AutoPM, pointing out a more general and scalable way to improve LLM performance.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 18b066f8-8492-4950-845d-3d97c4e4313aCited by top-tier papers5
- Semi-Supervised Preference Optimization with Limited FeedbackSeonggyun Lee, Sungjun Lim, Seojin Park, Soeun Cheon et al.ICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- Focus On This, Not That! Steering LLMs with Adaptive Feature SpecificationTom A. Lamb, Adam Davies, Alasdair Paren, Philip Torr et al.ICML 2025
- SafeConstellations: Mitigating Over-Refusals in LLMs Through Task-Aware Representation SteeringUtsav Maskey, Sumit Yadav, Mark Dras, Usman NaseemACL 2026
- Improving Reward Model Generalization from Adversarial Process Enhanced PreferencesZhilong Zhang, Tian Xu, Xinghao Du, Xingchen Cao et al.ICML 2025
- Measuring Diversity in Synthetic DatasetsYuchang Zhu, Huizhe Zhang, Bingzhe Wu, Jintang Li et al.ICML 2025
Builds on11
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human FalsehoodsStephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain EvansACL 2022 · 3,228 citations
- ZeRO: memory optimizations toward training trillion parameter modelsSamyam Rajbhandari, Jeff Rasley, Olatunji Ruwase, Yuxiong HeSC 2020 · 852 citations
- Principle-Driven Self-Alignment of Language Models from Scratch with Minimal Human SupervisionZhiqing Sun, Yikang Shen, Qinhong Zhou, Hongxin Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 463 citations
Related papers
- ActiveDPO: Active Direct Preference Optimization for Sample-Efficient AlignmentXiaoqiang Lin, Arun Verma, Zhongxiang Dai, Daniela Rus et al.ICLR 2026 · 12 citations
- Larger or Smaller Reward Margins to Select Preferences for LLM Alignment?Kexin Huang, Junkang Wu, Ziqian Chen, Xue Wang et al.ICML 2025
- Data Selection for LLM Alignment Using Fine-Grained PreferencesJia Zhang, Yao Liu, Chen-Xi Zhang, Yi Liu et al.ICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- Direct Large Language Model Alignment Through Self-Rewarding Contrastive Prompt DistillationAiwei Liu, Haoping Bai, Zhiyun Lu, Xiang Kong et al.ACL 2024 · 4 citations
- What Matters in Data for DPO?Yu Pan, Zhongze Cai, Huaiyang Zhong, Guanting Chen et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 13 citations
