Sharing Pattern Submodels for Prediction with Missing Values
Lena Stempfle, Ashkan Panahi, Fredrik D. Johansson
Abstract
Missing values are unavoidable in many applications of machine learning and present challenges both during training and at test time. When variables are missing in recurring patterns, fitting separate pattern submodels have been proposed as a solution. However, fitting models independently does not make efficient use of all available data. Conversely, fitting a single shared model to the full data set relies on imputation which often leads to biased results when missingness depends on unobserved factors. We propose an alternative approach, called sharing pattern submodels (SPSM), which i) makes predictions that are robust to missing values at test time, ii) maintains or improves the predictive power of pattern submodels, and iii) has a short description, enabling improved interpretability. Parameter sharing is enforced through sparsity-inducing regularization which we prove leads to consistent estimation. Finally, we give conditions for when a sharing model is optimal, even when both missingness and the target outcome depend on unobserved variables. Classification and regression experiments on synthetic and real-world data sets demonstrate that our models achieve a favorable tradeoff between pattern specialization and information sharing.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 18931f9c-eb25-40bc-94b2-c4d12e5f04feCited by top-tier papers3
- Interpretable Generalized Additive Models for Datasets with Missing ValuesHayden McTavish, Jon Donnelly, Margo I. Seltzer, Cynthia RudinNeurIPS 2024 · 9 citations
- Prediction models that learn to avoid missing valuesLena Stempfle, Anton Matsson, Newton Mwai Kinyanjui, Fredrik D. JohanssonICML 2025
- Leveraging Predictive Equivalence in Decision TreesHayden McTavish, Zachery Boner, Jon Donnelly, Margo I. Seltzer et al.ICML 2025
Builds on2
- What's a good imputation to predict with missing values?Marine Le Morvan, Julie Josse, Erwan Scornet, Gaël VaroquauxNeurIPS 2021 · 95 citations
- NeuMiss networks: differentiable programming for supervised learning with missing valuesMarine Le Morvan, Julie Josse, Thomas Moreau, Erwan Scornet et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 50 citations
Related papers
- MIRACLE: Causally-Aware Imputation via Learning Missing Data MechanismsTrent Kyono, Yao Zhang, Alexis Bellot, Mihaela van der SchaarNeurIPS 2021 · 105 citations
- Collaborative Imputation for Multivariate Time Series with Convergence GuaranteeYu Sun, Xinyu Yang, Shaoxu Song, Ying Zhang et al.ICDE 2025 · 2 citations
- Naive imputation implicitly regularizes high-dimensional linear modelsAlexis Ayme, Claire Boyer, Aymeric Dieuleveut, Erwan ScornetICML 2023 · 10 citations
- Imputation for prediction: beware of diminishing returnsMarine Le Morvan, Gaël VaroquauxICLR 2025
- Estimation and Imputation in Probabilistic Principal Component Analysis with Missing Not At Random DataAude Sportisse, Claire Boyer, Julie JosseNeurIPS 2020 · 38 citations
