Regularization properties of adversarially-trained linear regression
Antônio H. Ribeiro, Dave Zachariah, Francis R. Bach, Thomas B. Schön
Abstract
State-of-the-art machine learning models can be vulnerable to very small input perturbations that are adversarially constructed. Adversarial training is an effective approach to defend against it. Formulated as a min-max problem, it searches for the best solution when the training data were corrupted by the worst-case attacks. Linear models are among the simple models where vulnerabilities can be observed and are the focus of our study. In this case, adversarial training leads to a convex optimization problem which can be formulated as the minimization of a finite sum. We provide a comparative analysis between the solution of adversarial training in linear regression and other regularization methods. Our main findings are that: (A) Adversarial training yields the minimum-norm interpolating solution in the overparameterized regime (more parameters than data), as long as the maximum disturbance radius is smaller than a threshold. And, conversely, the minimum-norm interpolator is the solution to adversarial training with a given radius. (B) Adversarial training can be equivalent to parameter shrinking methods (ridge regression and Lasso). This happens in the underparametrized region, for an appropriate choice of adversarial radius and zero-mean symmetrically distributed covariates. (C) For -adversarial training -- as in square-root Lasso -- the choice of adversarial radius for optimal bounds does not depend on the additive noise variance. We confirm our theoretical findings with numerical examples.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1779d05f-8fd0-47e0-af90-e4ddee5181f6Cited by top-tier papers10
- H-Consistency Guarantees for RegressionAnqi Mao, Mehryar Mohri, Yutao ZhongICML 2024 · 18 citations
- Short-length Adversarial Training Helps LLMs Defend Long-length Jailbreak Attacks: Theoretical and Empirical EvidenceShaopeng Fu, Liang Ding, Jingfeng Zhang, Di WangNeurIPS 2025 · 15 citations
- Optimal Classification under Performative Distribution ShiftEdwige Cyffers, Muni Sreenivas Pydi, Jamal Atif, Olivier CappéNeurIPS 2024 · 11 citations
- High-dimensional (Group) Adversarial Training in Linear RegressionYiling Xie, Xiaoming HuoNeurIPS 2024 · 8 citations
- On the Interaction of Compressibility and Adversarial RobustnessMelih Barsbey, Antônio H. Ribeiro, Umut Simsekli, Tolga BirdalICLR 2026 · 3 citations
Builds on2
- Uniform Convergence of Interpolators: Gaussian Width, Norm Bounds and Benign OverfittingFrederic Koehler, Lijia Zhou, Danica J. Sutherland, Nathan SrebroNeurIPS 2021 · 65 citations
- Sharp Statistical Guaratees for Adversarially Robust Gaussian ClassificationChen Dan, Yuting Wei, Pradeep RavikumarICML 2020 · 18 citations
Related papers
- Kernel Learning with Adversarial Features: Numerical Efficiency and Adaptive RegularizationAntônio H. Ribeiro, David Vävinggren, Dave Zachariah, Thomas B. Schön et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
- Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent based Adversarial Training on Separable DataYan Li, Ethan X. Fang, Huan Xu, Tuo ZhaoICLR 2020 · 40 citations
- Adversarial Robustness with Semi-Infinite Constrained LearningAlexander Robey, Luiz F. O. Chamon, George J. Pappas, Hamed Hassani et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 51 citations
- Better Safe Than Sorry: Preventing Delusive Adversaries with Adversarial TrainingLue Tao, Lei Feng, Jinfeng Yi, Sheng-Jun Huang et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 90 citations
- More Data Can Expand The Generalization Gap Between Adversarially Robust and Standard ModelsLin Chen, Yifei Min, Mingrui Zhang, Amin KarbasiICML 2020 · 66 citations
