Equity Promotion in Public Transportation
Anik Pramanik, Pan Xu, Yifan Xu
Abstract
There are many news articles reporting the obstacles confronting poverty-stricken households in access to public transits. These barriers create a great deal of inconveniences for these impoverished families and more importantly, they contribute a lot of social inequalities. A typical approach addressing the issue is to build more transport infrastructure to offer more opportunities to access the public transits especially for those deprived communities. Examples include adding more bus lines connecting needy residents to railways systems and extending existing bus lines to areas with low socioeconomic status. Recently, a new strategy is proposed, which is to harness the ubiquitous ride-hailing services to connect disadvantaged households with the nearest public transportations. Compared with the former infrastructure-based solution, the ride-hailing-based strategy enjoys a few exclusive benefits such as higher effectiveness and more flexibility.
In this paper, we propose an optimization model to study how to integrate the two approaches together for equity-promotion purposes. Specifically, we aim to design a strategy of allocating a given limited budget to different candidate programs such that the overall social equity is maximized, which is defined as the minimum covering ratio among all pre-specified protected groups of households (based on race, income, etc.). We have designed a linear-programming (LP) based rounding algorithm, which proves to achieve an optimal approximation ratio of 1-1/e. Additionally, we test our algorithm against a few baselines on real data assembled by outsourcing multiple public datasets collected in the city of Chicago. Experimental results confirm our theoretical predictions and demonstrate the effectiveness of our LP-based strategy in promoting social equity, especially when the budget is insufficient.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1710d573-a0de-4301-b749-737175fbe2fdCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on3
- Balancing the Tradeoff between Profit and Fairness in Rideshare Platforms during High-Demand HoursVedant Nanda, Pan Xu, Karthik Abinav Sankararaman, John P. Dickerson et al.AAAI 2020 · 73 citations
- Class Fairness in Online MatchingHadi Hosseini, Zhiyi Huang, Ayumi Igarashi, Nisarg ShahAAAI 2023 · 21 citations
- Equity Promotion in Online Resource AllocationPan Xu, Yifan XuAAAI 2022 · 4 citations
Related papers
- Uncovering Disparities in Rideshare Drivers’ Earning and Work Patterns: A Case Study of ChicagoHy Dang, Yuwen Lu, Jason Spicer, Tamara Kay et al.CSCW 2026
- Fair Transit Stop Placement: A Clustering Perspective and BeyondHaris Aziz, Ling Gai, Yuhang Guo, Jeremy VollenICML 2026 · 3 citations
- The Simpler The Better: An Indexing Approach for Shared-Route Planning QueriesYuxiang Zeng, Yongxin Tong, Yuguang Song, Lei ChenVLDB 2020 · 18 citations
- Hierarchical Optimization via LLM-Guided Objective Evolution for Mobility-on-Demand SystemsYi Zhang, Yushen Long, Yun Ni, Liping Huang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- When Recommender Systems Meet Fleet Management: Practical Study in Online Driver Repositioning SystemZhe Xu, Chang Men, Peng Li, Bicheng Jin et al.WWW 2020 · 36 citations
