TRACE: Trajectory-Aware Comprehensive Evaluation for Deep Research Agents
Yanyu Chen, Jiyue Jiang, Jiahong Liu, Yifei Zhang, Xiao Guo, Irwin King
Abstract
The evaluation of Deep Research Agents is a critical challenge, as conventional outcome-based metrics fail to capture the nuances of their complex reasoning. Current evaluation faces two primary challenges: 1) a reliance on singular metrics like Pass@1, creating a ''high-score illusion'' that ignores the quality, efficiency, and soundness of the reasoning process; and 2) the failure of static benchmarks to quantify crucial attributes like robustness and latent capability. To address these gaps, we introduce TRACE (Trajectory-Aware Comprehensive Evaluation), a framework that holistically assesses the entire problem-solving trajectory. To counter the ''high-score illusion'', we propose a Hierarchical Trajectory Utility Function that quantifies process efficiency and cognitive quality, including evidence grounding, alongside accuracy. To measure deeper attributes, TRACE introduces a Scaffolded Capability Assessment protocol, quantifying an agent's latent ability by determining the minimum guidance needed for success. Our contributions include the TRACE framework, its novel metrics, and the accompanying DeepResearch-Bench with controllable complexity. Experiments show TRACE delivers a granular ranking that uncovers critical trade-offs between agent accuracy, efficiency, and robustness entirely missed by singular metrics.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 16d06d12-5510-45d7-9c50-16b9310ebdf1Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on11
- Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot LearnersJason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu et al.ICLR 2022 · 4,966 citations
- GAIA: a benchmark for General AI AssistantsGrégoire Mialon, Clémentine Fourrier, Thomas Wolf, Yann LeCun et al.ICLR 2024 · 716 citations
- ReTool: Reinforcement Learning for Strategic Tool Use in LLMsJiazhan Feng, Shijue Huang, Xingwei Qu, Ge Zhang et al.ICLR 2026 · 406 citations
- ToolRL: Reward is All Tool Learning NeedsCheng Qian, Emre Can Acikgoz, Qi He, Hongru Wang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 387 citations
- WebSailor-V2: Bridging the Chasm to Proprietary Agents via Synthetic Data and Scalable Reinforcement LearningKuan Li, Zhongwang Zhang, Huifeng Yin, Rui Ye et al.ICLR 2026 · 65 citations
Related papers
- Beyond the Final Answer: Evaluating the Reasoning Trajectories of Tool-Augmented AgentsWonjoong Kim, Sangwu Park, Yeonjun In, Sein Kim et al.ICML 2026 · 15 citations
- DREAM: Deep Research Evaluation with Agentic MetricsElad Ben-Avraham, Changhao Li, Ron Dorfman, Roy Ganz et al.ACL 2026 · 2 citations
- Towards Self-Evolving Agent Benchmarks : Validatable Agent Trajectory via Test-Time ExplorationDadi Guo, Tianyi Zhou, Dongrui Liu, Chen Qian et al.ICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- A Temporal Reasoning Benchmarking Framework for LRMs via Difficulty-Controlled and Dynamic Test GenerationShide Zhou, Kailong Wang, Ling Shi, Haoyu WangISSTA 2026
- TRAJECT-Bench: A Trajectory-Aware Benchmark for Evaluating Agentic Tool UsePengfei He, Zhenwei Dai, Bing He, Hui Liu et al.ICLR 2026 · 46 citations
