A Spatio-Temporal Point Process for Fine-Grained Modeling of Reading Behavior
Francesco Ignazio Re, Andreas Opedal, Glib Manaiev, Mario Giulianelli, Ryan Cotterell
Abstract
Reading is a process that unfolds across space and time, alternating between fixations where a reader focuses on a specific point in space, and saccades where a reader rapidly shifts their focus to a new point. An ansatz of psycholinguistics is that modeling a reader's fixations and saccades yields insight into their online sentence processing. However, standard approaches to such modeling rely on aggregated eye-tracking measurements and models that impose strong assumptions, ignoring much of the spatio-temporal dynamics that occur during reading. In this paper, we propose a more general probabilistic model of reading behavior, based on a marked spatio-temporal point process, that captures not only how long fixations last, but also where they land in space and when they take place in time. The saccades are modeled using a Hawkes process, which captures how each fixation excites the probability of a new fixation occurring near it in time and space. The duration time of fixation events is modeled as a function of fixation-specific predictors convolved across time, thus capturing spillover effects. Empirically, our Hawkes process model exhibits a better fit to human saccades than baselines. With respect to fixation durations, we observe that incorporating contextual surprisal as a predictor results in only a marginal improvement in the model's predictive accuracy. This finding suggests that surprisal theory struggles to explain fine-grained eye movements. https://github.com/rycolab/ spatio-temporal-reading
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1675caf1-a8fa-4d9b-8335-975e269beeb4Cited by top-tier papers2
- On the Proper Treatment of Units in Surprisal TheorySamuel Kiegeland, Vésteinn Snæbjarnarson, Tim Vieira, Ryan CotterellACL 2026
- Probing for Reading TimesEleftheria Tsipidi, Samuel Kiegeland, Francesco Ignazio Re, Tianyang Xu et al.ACL 2026
Builds on8
- Improving Natural Language Processing Tasks with Human Gaze-Guided Neural AttentionEkta Sood, Simon Tannert, Philipp Müller, Andreas BullingNeurIPS 2020 · 91 citations
- Counterfactual Temporal Point ProcessesKimia Noorbakhsh, Manuel Gomez-RodriguezNeurIPS 2022 · 31 citations
- User-Dependent Neural Sequence Models for Continuous-Time Event DataAlex Boyd, Robert Bamler, Stephan Mandt, Padhraic SmythNeurIPS 2020 · 27 citations
- Causal Inference for Event Pairs in Multivariate Point ProcessesTian Gao, Dharmashankar Subramanian, Debarun Bhattacharjya, Xiao Shou et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 21 citations
- ScanDL: A Diffusion Model for Generating Synthetic Scanpaths on TextsLena S. Bolliger, David R. Reich, Patrick Haller, Deborah N. Jakobi et al.EMNLP 2023 · 6 citations
Related papers
- Towards A Scanpath-Conditioned Surprisal Theory: Modeling Reader Information StatesMichael Mooney, Edmond S. L. HoACL 2026
- From Human Reading to NLM Understanding: Evaluating the Role of Eye-Tracking Data in Encoder-Based ModelsLuca Dini, Lucia Domenichelli, Dominique Brunato, Felice Dell'OrlettaACL 2025
- Surprisal Estimators for Human Reading Times Need Character ModelsByung-Doh Oh, Christian Clark, William SchulerACL 2021
- CalibRead: Unobtrusive Eye Tracking Calibration from Natural Reading BehaviorChang Liu, Chun Yu, Xiangyang Wang, Jianxiao Jiang et al.UbiComp 2025 · 2 citations
- Entropy- and Distance-Based Predictors From GPT-2 Attention Patterns Predict Reading Times Over and Above GPT-2 SurprisalByung-Doh Oh, William SchulerEMNLP 2022 · 13 citations
