GUIDER: Uncertainty Guided Dynamic Re-ranking for Large Language Models Based Recommender Systems
Cai Xu, Xujing Wang, Ziyu Guan, Wei Zhao, Meng Yan
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly integral to recommendation systems, offering sophisticated language understanding and generation capabilities. However, their practical application is often hindered by challenges such as data sparsity, the generation of unreliable or hallucinated recommendations, and a general lack of transparency in their decision-making processes. Existing mitigation strategies frequently introduce significant complexity or computational overhead. To address these limitations, particularly the critical gap in quantifying the confidence of LLMgenerated recommendations, we propose GUIDER: Uncertainty Guided Dynamic Re-ranking for Large Language Models based Recommender Systems. This new framework innovatively leverages the logits produced by LLMs as evidence for recommended items. By employing a Dirichlet distribution, GUIDER decomposes the total predictive uncertainty into distinct Data Uncertainty (DU), reflecting inherent data ambiguity, and Model Uncertainty (MU), indicating the model's own conviction. This principled decomposition, achieved with a single inference pass, enhances transparency and trustworthiness. Based on the quantified DU and MU levels, our system dynamically adapts its recommendation strategy-adjusting output diversity-through a fourquadrant analysis that tailors responses to specific uncertainty profiles. Extensive experiments conducted in zero-shot recommendation settings validate the effectiveness of our approach. GUIDER consistently outperforms existing methods in reliability-aware scenarios, demonstrably improving recommendation quality. This framework not only advances the practical deployment of LLM-based recommenders by making them more dependable but also provides a robust foundation for future research into uncertainty-aware generative systems.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on13
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 19,162 citations
- Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMsMiao Xiong, Zhiyuan Hu, Xinyang Lu, Yifei Li et al.ICLR 2024 · 867 citations
- Actions Speak Louder than Words: Trillion-Parameter Sequential Transducers for Generative RecommendationsJiaqi Zhai, Lucy Liao, Xing Liu, Yueming Wang et al.ICML 2024 · 200 citations
- Is ChatGPT Good at Search? Investigating Large Language Models as Re-Ranking AgentsWeiwei Sun, Lingyong Yan, Xinyu Ma, Shuaiqiang Wang et al.EMNLP 2023 · 182 citations
Related papers
- Uncertainty Quantification and Decomposition for LLM-based RecommendationWonbin Kweon, Sanghwan Jang, SeongKu Kang, Hwanjo YuWWW 2025 · 13 citations
- Beyond Utility: Evaluating LLM as RecommenderChumeng Jiang, Jiayin Wang, Weizhi Ma, Charles L. A. Clarke et al.WWW 2025 · 22 citations
- REALM: Recursive Relevance Modeling for LLM-based Document Re-RankingPinhuan Wang, Zhiqiu Xia, Chunhua Liao, Feiyi Wang et al.EMNLP 2025
- Logit Space Constrained Fine-Tuning for Mitigating Hallucinations in LLM-Based Recommender SystemsJianfeng Deng, Qingfeng Chen, Debo Cheng, Jiuyong Li et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
- Estimating LLM Consistency: A User Baseline vs Surrogate MetricsXiaoyuan Wu, Weiran Lin, Omer Akgul, Lujo BauerEMNLP 2025
