Efficient Second-Order TreeCRF for Neural Dependency Parsing
Yu Zhang, Zhenghua Li, Min Zhang
Abstract
In the deep learning (DL) era, parsing models are extremely simplified with little hurt on performance, thanks to the remarkable capability of multi-layer BiLSTMs in context representation. As the most popular graphbased dependency parser due to its high efficiency and performance, the biaffine parser directly scores single dependencies under the arc-factorization assumption, and adopts a very simple local token-wise cross-entropy training loss. This paper for the first time presents a second-order TreeCRF extension to the biaffine parser. For a long time, the complexity and inefficiency of the inside-outside algorithm hinder the popularity of TreeCRF. To address this issue, we propose an effective way to batchify the inside and Viterbi algorithms for direct large matrix operation on GPUs, and to avoid the complex outside algorithm via efficient back-propagation. Experiments and analysis on 27 datasets from 13 languages clearly show that techniques developed before the DL era, such as structural learning (global TreeCRF loss) and high-order modeling are still useful, and can further boost parsing performance over the state-of-the-art biaffine parser, especially for partially annotated training data. We release our code at https: //github.com/yzhangcs/crfpar.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers28
- Masked Language Modeling and the Distributional Hypothesis: Order Word Matters Pre-training for LittleKoustuv Sinha, Robin Jia, Dieuwke Hupkes, Joelle Pineau et al.EMNLP 2021 · 177 citations
- Semantic Probabilistic Layers for Neuro-Symbolic LearningKareem Ahmed, Stefano Teso, Kai-Wei Chang, Guy Van den Broeck et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 133 citations
- Disentangling syntax and semantics in the brain with deep networksCharlotte Caucheteux, Alexandre Gramfort, Jean-Remi KingICML 2021 · 96 citations
- Nested Named Entity Recognition with Partially-Observed TreeCRFsYao Fu, Chuanqi Tan, Mosha Chen, Songfang Huang et al.AAAI 2021 · 65 citations
- Nested Named Entity Recognition as Latent Lexicalized Constituency ParsingChao Lou, Songlin Yang, Kewei TuACL 2022 · 46 citations
Related papers
- Dependency Parsing is More Parameter-Efficient with NormalizationPaolo Gajo, Domenic Rosati, Hassan Sajjad, Alberto Barrón-CedeñoNeurIPS 2025
- Semi-Supervised Semantic Dependency Parsing Using CRF AutoencodersZixia Jia, Youmi Ma, Jiong Cai, Kewei TuACL 2020 · 10 citations
- Revisiting Structured Sentiment Analysis as Latent Dependency Graph ParsingChengjie Zhou, Bobo Li, Hao Fei, Fei Li et al.ACL 2024
- Probing for Labeled Dependency TreesMax Müller-Eberstein, Rob van der Goot, Barbara PlankACL 2022 · 10 citations
- Fast and Accurate Non-Projective Dependency Tree LinearizationXiang Yu, Simon Tannert, Ngoc Thang Vu, Jonas KuhnACL 2020 · 3 citations
