Better Hit the Nail on the Head than Beat around the Bush: Removing Protected Attributes with a Single Projection
Pantea Haghighatkhah, Antske Fokkens, Pia Sommerauer, Bettina Speckmann, Kevin Verbeek
Abstract
Bias elimination and recent probing studies attempt to remove specific information from embedding spaces. Here it is important to remove as much of the target information as possible, while preserving any other information present. INLP is a popular recent method which removes specific information through iterative nullspace projections. Multiple iterations, however, increase the risk that information other than the target is negatively affected. We introduce two methods that find a single targeted projection: Mean Projection (MP, more efficient) and Tukey Median Projection (TMP, with theoretical guarantees). Our comparison between MP and INLP shows that (1) one MP projection removes linear separability based on the target and (2) MP has less impact on the overall space. Further analysis shows that applying random projections after MP leads to the same overall effects on the embedding space as the multiple projections of INLP. Applying one targeted (MP) projection hence is methodologically cleaner than applying multiple (INLP) projections that introduce random effects.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1446d743-fa50-409d-9801-3f2f50b8cdabCited by top-tier papers5
- Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single DirectionAndy Arditi, Oscar Obeso, Aaquib Syed, Daniel Paleka et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 1,166 citations
- LEACE: Perfect linear concept erasure in closed formNora Belrose, David Schneider-Joseph, Shauli Ravfogel, Ryan Cotterell et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 305 citations
- RepIt: Steering Language Models with Concept-Specific Refusal VectorsVincent Siu, Nathan W. Henry, Nicholas Crispino, Yang Liu et al.ICLR 2026 · 12 citations
- Preserving Task-Relevant Information Under Linear Concept RemovalFloris Holstege, Shauli Ravfogel, Bram WoutersNeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
- Language Concept Erasure for Language-invariant Dense RetrievalZhiqi Huang, Puxuan Yu, Shauli Ravfogel, James AllanEMNLP 2024 · 1 citation
Builds on7
- Harms of Gender Exclusivity and Challenges in Non-Binary Representation in Language TechnologiesSunipa Dev, Masoud Monajatipoor, Anaelia Ovalle, Arjun Subramonian et al.EMNLP 2021 · 113 citations
- Linear Adversarial Concept ErasureShauli Ravfogel, Michael Twiton, Yoav Goldberg, Ryan CotterellICML 2022 · 89 citations
- OSCaR: Orthogonal Subspace Correction and Rectification of Biases in Word EmbeddingsSunipa Dev, Tao Li, Jeff M. Phillips, Vivek SrikumarEMNLP 2021 · 31 citations
- Probing Word Syntactic Representations in the Brain by a Feature Elimination MethodXiaohan Zhang, Shaonan Wang, Nan Lin, Jiajun Zhang et al.AAAI 2022 · 26 citations
- Null It Out: Guarding Protected Attributes by Iterative Nullspace ProjectionShauli Ravfogel, Yanai Elazar, Hila Gonen, Michael Twiton et al.ACL 2020 · 25 citations
Related papers
- Robust Estimation of Sparse Numerical Vectors under Local Differential PrivacyPuning Zhao, Zhikun Zhang, Shaowei Wang, Sheng Yue et al.CCS 2026
- Random-projection ensemble dimension reductionWenxing Zhou, Timothy I. CanningsICLR 2026
- Removing Spurious Concepts from Neural Network Representations via Joint Subspace EstimationFloris Holstege, Bram Wouters, Noud P. A. van Giersbergen, Cees G. H. DiksICML 2024 · 3 citations
- From Measurement to Mitigation: Quantifying and Reducing Identity Leakage in Image Representation Encoders with Linear Subspace RemovalDaniel George, Charles Yeh, Daniel Lee, Yifei ZhangCVPR 2026
- WRING Out The Bias: A Rotation-Based Alternative To Projection DebiasingWalter Gerych, Cassandra Parent, Quinn Perian, Rafiya Javed et al.ICLR 2026
