What is Sensitive About (Sensitive) Data? Characterizing Sensitivity and Intimacy with Google Assistant Users
Alejandra Gómez Ortega, Jacky Bourgeois, Gerd Kortuem
Abstract
Digital technologies have increasingly integrated into people’s lives, continuously capturing their behavior through potentially sensitive data. In the context of voice assistants, there is a misalignment between experts, regulators, and users on whether and what data is ‘sensitive’, partly due to how data is presented to users; as single interactions. We investigate users’ perspectives on the sensitivity and intimacy of their Google Assistant speech records, introduced comprehensively as single interactions, patterns, and inferences. We collect speech records through data donation and explore them in collaboration with 17 users during interviews based on predefined data-sharing scenarios. Our results indicate a tipping point in perceived sensitivity and intimacy as participants delve deeper into their data and the information derived from it. We propose a conceptualization of sensitivity and intimacy that accounts for the fuzzy nature of data and must disentangle from it. We discuss the implications of our findings and provide recommendations.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 140474c1-320e-4881-8239-6afaef51b592Cited by top-tier papers4
- SoK: Technical Implementation and Human Impact of Internet Privacy RegulationsEleanor Birrell, Jay Rodolitz, Angel Ding, Jenna Lee et al.S&P 2024 · 11 citations
- "Just Like, Risking Your Life Here": Participatory Design of User Interactions with Risk Detection AI to Prevent Online-to-Offline Harm Through Dating AppsIsha Datey, Douglas ZytkoCSCW 2024 · 11 citations
- Surrendering to Powerlesness: Governing Personal Data Flows in Generative AIAlejandra Gómez Ortega, Hosana Morales Ornelas, Ugur GençCHI 2025 · 9 citations
- PAIRcolator: Pair Collaboration for Sensemaking and Reflection on Personal DataDi Yan, Jacky Bourgeois, Yen-Chia Hsu, Gerd KortuemCHI 2025 · 7 citations
Builds on12
- Privacy Norms for Smart Home Personal AssistantsNoura Abdi, Xiao Zhan, Kopo M. Ramokapane, Jose M. SuchCHI 2021 · 107 citations
- Caring for Intimate Data in Fertility TechnologiesMaryam Mehrnezhad, Teresa AlmeidaCHI 2021 · 89 citations
- "It did not give me an option to decline": A Longitudinal Analysis of the User Experience of Security and Privacy in Smart Home ProductsGeorge Chalhoub, Martin J. Kraemer, Norbert Nthala, Ivan FlechaisCHI 2021 · 71 citations
- Evaluating the Contextual Integrity of Privacy Regulation: Parents' IoT Toy Privacy Norms Versus COPPANoah J. Apthorpe, Sarah Varghese, Nick FeamsterUSENIX Security 2019 · 69 citations
- Understanding Fitness Tracker Users' Security and Privacy Knowledge, Attitudes and BehavioursSandra Gabriele, Sonia ChiassonCHI 2020 · 61 citations
Related papers
- Understanding and Improving Usability of Data Dashboards for Simplified Privacy Control of Voice Assistant DataVandit Sharma, Mainack MondalUSENIX Security 2022
- Owning and Sharing: Privacy Perceptions of Smart Speaker UsersNicole Meng, Dilara Keküllüoglu, Kami VanieaCSCW 2021 · 50 citations
- Investigating Users' Preferences and Expectations for Always-Listening Voice AssistantsMadiha Tabassum, Tomasz Kosinski, Alisa Frik, Nathan Malkin et al.UbiComp 2020 · 74 citations
- Genie in the Bottle: Anthropomorphized Perceptions of Conversational AgentsAnastasia Kuzminykh, Jenny Sun, Nivetha Govindaraju, Jeff Avery et al.CHI 2020 · 41 citations
- The Human in Emotion Recognition on Social Media: Attitudes, Outcomes, RisksNazanin Andalibi, Justin BussCHI 2020 · 118 citations
