Test Time Adaptation with Regularized Loss for Weakly Supervised Salient Object Detection
Olga Veksler
Abstract
It is well known that CNNs tend to overfit to the training data. Test-time adaptation is an extreme approach to deal with overfitting: given a test image, the aim is to adapt the trained model to that image. Indeed nothing can be closer to the test data than the test image itself. The main difficulty of test-time adaptation is that the ground truth is not available. Thus test-time adaptation, while intriguing, applies to only a few scenarios where one can design an effective loss function that does not require ground truth. We propose the first approach for test-time Salient Object Detection (SOD) in the context of weak supervision. Our approach is based on a so called regularized loss function, which can be used for training CNN when pixel precise ground truth is unavailable. Regularized loss tends to have lower values for the more likely object segments, and thus it can be used to finetune an already trained CNN to a given test image, adapting to images unseen during training. We develop a regularized loss function particularly suitable for test-time adaptation and show that our approach significantly outperforms prior work for weakly supervised SOD.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 13463913-a4dc-4249-84b5-b43e6c42eb81Cited by top-tier papers5
- Test-time Adaptation for Foundation Medical Segmentation Model without Parametric UpdatesKecheng Chen, Xinyu Luo, Tiexin Qin, Jie Liu et al.ICCV 2025
- Free on the Fly: Enhancing Flexibility in Test-Time Adaptation with Online EMQiyuan Dai, Sibei YangCVPR 2025
- GOOD: Geometry-guided Out-of-Distribution Modeling for Open-set Test-time Adaptation in Point Cloud Semantic SegmentationTianpei Zou, Guo Yu, Ya Wu, Fan Lu et al.ICLR 2026
- Salient Object Ranking via Cyclical Perception-Viewing Interaction ModelingRongjin Guo, Ke Xu, Rynson W. H. LauICLR 2026
- Probabilistic Salient Object RankingRongjin Guo, Guan Huankang, Rynson W LauICML 2026
Builds on5
- Consistent video depth estimationXuan Luo, Jia-Bin Huang, Richard Szeliski, Kevin Matzen et al.SIGGRAPH 2020 · 321 citations
- Structure-Consistent Weakly Supervised Salient Object Detection with Local Saliency CoherenceSiyue Yu, Bingfeng Zhang, Jimin Xiao, Eng Gee LimAAAI 2021 · 162 citations
- MFNet: Multi-filter Directive Network for Weakly Supervised Salient Object DetectionYongri Piao, Jian Wang, Miao Zhang, Huchuan LuICCV 2021 · 64 citations
- Robust Trust Region for Weakly Supervised SegmentationDmitrii Marin, Yuri BoykovICCV 2021 · 4 citations
- Weakly-Supervised Salient Object Detection via Scribble AnnotationsJing Zhang, Xin Yu, Aixuan Li, Peipei Song et al.CVPR 2020
Related papers
- TTA-COPE: Test-Time Adaptation for Category-Level Object Pose EstimationTaeyeop Lee, Jonathan Tremblay, Valts Blukis, Bowen Wen et al.CVPR 2023
- Is Depth Really Necessary for Salient Object Detection?Jiawei Zhao, Yifan Zhao, Jia Li, Xiaowu ChenACM MM 2020 · 71 citations
- Parameter-free Online Test-time AdaptationMalik Boudiaf, Romain Müller, Ismail Ben Ayed, Luca BertinettoCVPR 2022 · 116 citations
- Modeling the Distributional Uncertainty for Salient Object Detection ModelsXinyu Tian, Jing Zhang, Mochu Xiang, Yuchao DaiCVPR 2023
- Regularizing CNN Transfer Learning With Randomised RegressionYang Zhong, Atsuto MakiCVPR 2020
