Sparse Weight Averaging with Multiple Particles for Iterative Magnitude Pruning
Moonseok Choi, Hyungi Lee, Giung Nam, Juho Lee
Abstract
Given the ever-increasing size of modern neural networks, the significance of sparse architectures has surged due to their accelerated inference speeds and minimal memory demands. When it comes to global pruning techniques, Iterative Magnitude Pruning (IMP) still stands as a state-of-the-art algorithm despite its simple nature, particularly in extremely sparse regimes. In light of the recent finding that the two successive matching IMP solutions are linearly connected without a loss barrier, we propose Sparse Weight Averaging with Multiple Particles (SWAMP), a straightforward modification of IMP that achieves performance comparable to an ensemble of two IMP solutions. For every iteration, we concurrently train multiple sparse models, referred to as particles, using different batch orders yet the same matching ticket, and then weight average such models to produce a single mask. We demonstrate that our method consistently outperforms existing baselines across different sparsities through extensive experiments on various data and neural network structures.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on22
- Sharpness-aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving GeneralizationPierre Foret, Ariel Kleiner, Hossein Mobahi, Behnam NeyshaburICLR 2021 · 1,861 citations
- Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timeMitchell Wortsman, Gabriel Ilharco, Samir Yitzhak Gadre, Rebecca Roelofs et al.ICML 2022 · 1,464 citations
- Pruning neural networks without any data by iteratively conserving synaptic flowHidenori Tanaka, Daniel Kunin, Daniel L. K. Yamins, Surya GanguliNeurIPS 2020 · 884 citations
- Linear Mode Connectivity and the Lottery Ticket HypothesisJonathan Frankle, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite, Daniel M. Roy, Michael CarbinICML 2020 · 750 citations
- Picking Winning Tickets Before Training by Preserving Gradient FlowChaoqi Wang, Guodong Zhang, Roger B. GrosseICLR 2020 · 743 citations
Related papers
- Sparse Model Soups: A Recipe for Improved Pruning via Model AveragingMax Zimmer, Christoph Spiegel, Sebastian PokuttaICLR 2024 · 22 citations
- Unmasking the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: What's Encoded in a Winning Ticket's Mask?Mansheej Paul, Feng Chen, Brett W. Larsen, Jonathan Frankle et al.ICLR 2023 · 2 citations
- Masks, Signs, And Learning Rate RewindingAdvait Harshal Gadhikar, Rebekka BurkholzICLR 2024 · 15 citations
- Lottery Pools: Winning More by Interpolating Tickets without Increasing Training or Inference CostLu Yin, Shiwei Liu, Meng Fang, Tianjin Huang et al.AAAI 2023 · 14 citations
- Effective Sparsification of Neural Networks With Global Sparsity ConstraintXiao Zhou, Weizhong Zhang, Hang Xu, Tong ZhangCVPR 2021
