Better Correlation and Robustness: A Distribution-Balanced Self-Supervised Learning Framework for Automatic Dialogue Evaluation
Peiwen Yuan, Xinglin Wang, Jiayi Shi, Bin Sun, Yiwei Li
Abstract
Turn-level dialogue evaluation models (TDEMs), using self-supervised learning (SSL) framework, have achieved state-of-the-art performance in open-domain dialogue evaluation. However, these models inevitably face two potential problems. First, they have low correlations with humans on medium coherence samples as the SSL framework often brings training data with unbalanced coherence distribution. Second, the SSL framework leads TDEM to nonuniform score distribution. There is a danger that the nonuniform score distribution will weaken the robustness of TDEM through our theoretical analysis. To tackle these problems, we propose B etter C orrelation and R obustness (BCR), a distribution-balanced self-supervised learning framework for TDEM. Given a dialogue dataset, BCR offers an effective training set reconstructing method to provide coherence-balanced training signals and further facilitate balanced evaluating abilities of TDEM. To get a uniform score distribution, a novel loss function is proposed, which can adjust adaptively according to the uniformity of score distribution estimated by kernel density estimation. Comprehensive experiments on 17 benchmark datasets show that vanilla BERT-base using BCR outperforms SOTA methods significantly by 11.3% on average. BCR also demonstrates strong generalization ability as it can lead multiple SOTA methods to attain better correlation and robustness. Code and datasets: https://github.com/ypw0102/Better-Correlation-and-Robustness.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 129860a3-28f7-4a90-bd0d-9adc2a27151eCited by top-tier papers2
- BatchEval: Towards Human-like Text EvaluationPeiwen Yuan, Shaoxiong Feng, Yiwei Li, Xinglin Wang et al.ACL 2024
- Focused Large Language Models are Stable Many-Shot LearnersPeiwen Yuan, Shaoxiong Feng, Yiwei Li, Xinglin Wang et al.EMNLP 2024
Builds on13
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTTianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger et al.ICLR 2020 · 8,443 citations
- Asking and Answering Questions to Evaluate the Factual Consistency of SummariesAlex Wang, Kyunghyun Cho, Mike LewisACL 2020 · 317 citations
- PLATO: Pre-trained Dialogue Generation Model with Discrete Latent VariableSiqi Bao, Huang He, Fan Wang, Hua Wu et al.ACL 2020 · 229 citations
- GRADE: Automatic Graph-Enhanced Coherence Metric for Evaluating Open-Domain Dialogue SystemsLishan Huang, Zheng Ye, Jinghui Qin, Liang Lin et al.EMNLP 2020 · 73 citations
Related papers
- FineD-Eval: Fine-grained Automatic Dialogue-Level EvaluationChen Zhang, Luis Fernando D'Haro, Qiquan Zhang, Thomas Friedrichs et al.EMNLP 2022 · 13 citations
- Beyond User Self-Reported Likert Scale Ratings: A Comparison Model for Automatic Dialog EvaluationWeixin Liang, James Zou, Zhou YuACL 2020 · 25 citations
- Rating Distribution Calibration for Selection Bias Mitigation in RecommendationsHaochen Liu, Da Tang, Ji Yang, Xiangyu Zhao et al.WWW 2022 · 31 citations
- DialogBERT: Discourse-Aware Response Generation via Learning to Recover and Rank UtterancesXiaodong Gu, Kang Min Yoo, Jung-Woo HaAAAI 2021 · 83 citations
- DynaEval: Unifying Turn and Dialogue Level EvaluationChen Zhang, Yiming Chen, Luis Fernando D'Haro, Yan Zhang et al.ACL 2021
