Self-Interruptions of Non-Driving Related Tasks in Automated Vehicles: Mobile vs Head-Up Display
Michael A. Gerber, Ronald Schroeter, Xiaomeng Li, Mohammed Elhenawy
Abstract
Automated driving raises new human factors challenges. There is a paradox that allows drivers to perform non-driving related tasks (NDRTs), while benefiting from a driver who regularly attends to the driving task. Systems that aim to better manage a driver's attention, encouraging task switching and interleaving, may help address this paradox. However, a better understanding of how drivers self-interrupt while engaging in NDRTs is required to inform such systems. This paper presents a counterbalanced within-subject simulator study with N=42 participants experiencing automated driving in a familiar driving environment. Participants chose a TV show to watch on a HUD and mobile display during two 15min drives on the same route. Eye and head tracking data revealed more self-interruptions in the HUD condition, suggesting a higher likelihood of a higher situation awareness. Our results may benefit the design of future attention management systems by informing the visual and temporal integration of the driving and non-driving related task.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get 10b9e328-d3a0-4435-8b93-12de927d849dCited by top-tier papers6
- DeepTake: Prediction of Driver Takeover Behavior using Multimodal DataErfan Pakdamanian, Shili Sheng, Sonia Baee, Seongkook Heo et al.CHI 2021 · 86 citations
- Generalizing Gaze Estimation with Outlier-guided Collaborative AdaptationYunfei Liu, Ruicong Liu, Haofei Wang, Feng LuICCV 2021 · 80 citations
- Contrastive Regression for Domain Adaptation on Gaze EstimationYaoming Wang, Yangzhou Jiang, Jin Li, Bingbing Ni et al.CVPR 2022 · 80 citations
- An Eye Gaze Heatmap Analysis of Uncertainty Head-Up Display Designs for Conditional Automated DrivingMichael A. Gerber, Ronald Schroeter, Daniel Johnson, Christian P. Janssen et al.CHI 2024 · 10 citations
- Move, Connect, Interact: Introducing a Design Space for Cross-Traffic InteractionAnnika Stampf, Markus Sasalovici, Luca-Maxim Meinhardt, Mark Colley et al.UbiComp 2024 · 5 citations
Related papers
- Can You Hazard a Guess?: Evaluating the Effect of Augmented Reality Cues on Driver Hazard PredictionThomas Alexander Goodge, Frank E. Pollick, Stephen Anthony BrewsterCHI 2024 · 8 citations
- Little Road Driving HUD: Heads-Up Display Complexity Influences Drivers' Perceptions of Automated VehiclesRebecca Currano, So Yeon Park, Dylan James Moore, Kent Lyons et al.CHI 2021 · 68 citations
- Content Presentation on 3D Augmented Reality Windshield Displays in the Context of Automated DrivingAndreas Riegler, Andreas Riener, Clemens HolzmannIEEE VR 2022 · 15 citations
- Blending the Worlds: An evaluation of World-Fixed Visual Appearances in Automotive Augmented RealityRobin Connor Schramm, Markus Sasalovici, Jann Philipp Freiwald, Michael Martin Otto et al.CHI 2025 · 1 citation
- Interruptibility for In-vehicle Multitasking: Influence of Voice Task Demands and Adaptive BehaviorsAuk Kim, Jung-Mi Park, Uichin LeeUbiComp 2020 · 30 citations
