Lune

CHI2020Top-tier venue

Self-Interruptions of Non-Driving Related Tasks in Automated Vehicles: Mobile vs Head-Up Display

Michael A. Gerber, Ronald Schroeter, Xiaomeng Li, Mohammed Elhenawy

2020Year
51Citations
6Top-tier citations

Abstract

Automated driving raises new human factors challenges. There is a paradox that allows drivers to perform non-driving related tasks (NDRTs), while benefiting from a driver who regularly attends to the driving task. Systems that aim to better manage a driver's attention, encouraging task switching and interleaving, may help address this paradox. However, a better understanding of how drivers self-interrupt while engaging in NDRTs is required to inform such systems. This paper presents a counterbalanced within-subject simulator study with N=42 participants experiencing automated driving in a familiar driving environment. Participants chose a TV show to watch on a HUD and mobile display during two 15min drives on the same route. Eye and head tracking data revealed more self-interruptions in the HUD condition, suggesting a higher likelihood of a higher situation awareness. Our results may benefit the design of future attention management systems by informing the visual and temporal integration of the driving and non-driving related task.

Ask about this paper

Ask your agent about it.

Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Lunesearch_papers

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers get 10b9e328-d3a0-4435-8b93-12de927d849d

Cited by top-tier papers6

Ask how each one uses it

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines