Little Road Driving HUD: Heads-Up Display Complexity Influences Drivers' Perceptions of Automated Vehicles
Rebecca Currano, So Yeon Park, Dylan James Moore, Kent Lyons, David Sirkin
Abstract
Modern vehicles are using AI and increasingly sophisticated sensor suites to improve Advanced Driving Assistance Systems (ADAS) and support automated driving capabilities. Heads-Up-Displays (HUDs) provide an opportunity to visually inform drivers about vehicle perception and interpretation of the driving environment. One approach to HUD design may be to reveal to drivers the vehicle’s full contextual understanding, though it is not clear if the benefits of additional information outweigh the drawbacks of added complexity, or if this balance holds across drivers. We designed and tested an Augmented Reality (AR) HUD in an online study (N = 298), focusing on the influence of HUD visualizations on drivers’ situation awareness and perceptions. Participants viewed two driving scenes with one of three HUD conditions. Results were nuanced: situation awareness declined with increasing driving context complexity, and contrary to expectation, also declined with the presence of a HUD compared to no HUD. Significant differences were found by varying HUD complexity, which led us to explore different characterizations of complexity, including counts of scene items, item categories, and illuminated pixels. Our analysis finds that driving style interacts with driving context and HUD complexity, warranting further study.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get 0706e796-704d-4625-a034-e02c1626bd03Cited by top-tier papers7
- How to Communicate Robot Motion Intent: A Scoping ReviewMax Pascher, Uwe Gruenefeld, Stefan Schneegass, Jens GerkenCHI 2023 · 68 citations
- Effects of Scene Detection, Scene Prediction, and Maneuver Planning Visualizations on Trust, Situation Awareness, and Cognitive Load in Highly Automated VehiclesMark Colley, Max Rädler, Jonas Glimmann, Enrico RukzioUbiComp 2022 · 66 citations
- AdaptiveVoice: Cognitively Adaptive Voice Interface for Driving AssistanceShaoyue Wen, Songming Ping, Jialin Wang, Hai-Ning Liang et al.CHI 2024 · 19 citations
- OptiCarVis: Improving Automated Vehicle Functionality Visualizations Using Bayesian Optimization to Enhance User ExperiencePascal Jansen, Mark Colley, Svenja Krauß, Daniel Hirschle et al.CHI 2025 · 19 citations
- What Did My Car Say? Impact of Autonomous Vehicle Explanation Errors and Driving Context On Comfort, Reliance, Satisfaction, and Driving ConfidenceRobert A. Kaufman, Aaron Broukhim, David Kirsh, Nadir WeibelCHI 2025 · 12 citations
Related papers
- Can You Hazard a Guess?: Evaluating the Effect of Augmented Reality Cues on Driver Hazard PredictionThomas Alexander Goodge, Frank E. Pollick, Stephen Anthony BrewsterCHI 2024 · 8 citations
- Self-Interruptions of Non-Driving Related Tasks in Automated Vehicles: Mobile vs Head-Up DisplayMichael A. Gerber, Ronald Schroeter, Xiaomeng Li, Mohammed ElhenawyCHI 2020 · 51 citations
- Matching Explanation Detail to Scene Complexity: Studying Situational Awareness-Specific Feedback in Pedestrian Encounter Driving ScenariosMd. Fazle Elahi, Yin-Chun Lu, Jing Chen, Renran TianCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- What and When to Explain?: On-road Evaluation of Explanations in Highly Automated VehiclesGwangbin Kim, Dohyeon Yeo, Taewoo Jo, Daniela Rus et al.UbiComp 2023 · 34 citations
- From Awareness to Intent: Mitigating Silent Driving System Failures through Prospective Situation Awareness Enhancing InterfacesJiyao Wang, Song Yan, Xiao Yang, Qihang He et al.CHI 2026 · 4 citations
