Efficient Exploration of Reward Functions in Inverse Reinforcement Learning via Bayesian Optimization
Sreejith Balakrishnan, Quoc Phong Nguyen, Bryan Kian Hsiang Low, Harold Soh
Abstract
The problem of inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) is relevant to a variety of tasks including value alignment and robot learning from demonstration. Despite significant algorithmic contributions in recent years, IRL remains an ill-posed problem at its core; multiple reward functions coincide with the observed behavior and the actual reward function is not identifiable without prior knowledge or supplementary information. This paper presents an IRL framework called Bayesian optimization-IRL (BO-IRL) which identifies multiple solutions that are consistent with the expert demonstrations by efficiently exploring the reward function space. BO-IRL achieves this by utilizing Bayesian Optimization along with our newly proposed kernel that (a) projects the parameters of policy invariant reward functions to a single point in a latent space and (b) ensures nearby points in the latent space correspond to reward functions yielding similar likelihoods. This projection allows the use of standard stationary kernels in the latent space to capture the correlations present across the reward function space. Empirical results on synthetic and real-world environments (model-free and model-based) show that BO-IRL discovers multiple reward functions while minimizing the number of expensive exact policy optimizations.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 103b1a47-308b-43ea-a18d-762c53d7d196Cited by top-tier papers11
- Differentially Private Federated Bayesian Optimization with Distributed ExplorationZhongxiang Dai, Bryan Kian Hsiang Low, Patrick JailletNeurIPS 2021 · 64 citations
- Unifying and Boosting Gradient-Based Training-Free Neural Architecture SearchYao Shu, Zhongxiang Dai, Zhaoxuan Wu, Bryan Kian Hsiang LowNeurIPS 2022 · 41 citations
- Sample-Then-Optimize Batch Neural Thompson SamplingZhongxiang Dai, Yao Shu, Bryan Kian Hsiang Low, Patrick JailletNeurIPS 2022 · 33 citations
- Inverse Decision Modeling: Learning Interpretable Representations of BehaviorDaniel Jarrett, Alihan Hüyük, Mihaela van der SchaarICML 2021 · 30 citations
- Identifiability and generalizability from multiple experts in Inverse Reinforcement LearningPaul Rolland, Luca Viano, Norman Schürhoff, Boris Nikolov et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22 citations
Builds on1
Related papers
- Bayesian Robust Optimization for Imitation LearningDaniel S. Brown, Scott Niekum, Marek PetrikNeurIPS 2020 · 43 citations
- Sub-optimal Experts mitigate Ambiguity in Inverse Reinforcement LearningRiccardo Poiani, Gabriele Curti, Alberto Maria Metelli, Marcello RestelliNeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations
- Is Inverse Reinforcement Learning Harder than Standard Reinforcement Learning? A Theoretical PerspectiveLei Zhao, Mengdi Wang, Yu BaiICML 2024 · 3 citations
- Inverse Reinforcement Learning in a Continuous State Space with Formal GuaranteesGregory Dexter, Kevin Bello, Jean HonorioNeurIPS 2021 · 9 citations
- Non-Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning via Successor Feature MatchingArnav Kumar Jain, Harley Wiltzer, Jesse Farebrother, Irina Rish et al.ICLR 2025
