When Workers Want to Say No: A View into Critical Consciousness and Workplace Democracy in Data Work
Carl F. DiSalvo, Annabel Rothschild, Lara L. Schenck, Ben Rydal Shapiro, Betsy James DiSalvo
Abstract
In this paper, we describe and reflect upon the development of critical consciousness and workplace democracy within an experimental workplace called DataWorks. Through DataWorks, we hire adults from communities historically minoritized in computing education and data careers, and train them in entry-level data skills developed through work on client projects. In this process, workers gain a range of skills. Some of these skills are technical, such as programming for data analysis; some are managerial, such as scoping and bidding projects; others are social, perhaps even political, such as the ability to say "No" to projects. In what follows, we describe a workshop series developed to build the workers' critical literacy and consciousness about their data work, specifically regarding the use of data in machine learning systems. After that, we describe a data project the workers questioned and resisted because they determined the work to be harmful. In that process, they demonstrated and enacted a critical consciousness towards data and machine learning. Reflecting on this enactment of data-focused critical consciousness, we identify themes that characterize a democratic workplace, describe the work of designing for organizational action and institutional relations, and discuss how worker and researcher positionality affects this work. In doing so, we argue for enabling workers to resist and refuse harmful data work and challenge the standard power structures of academic research and data work.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Cited by top-tier papers5
- Disentangling the Power Dynamics in Participatory Data PhysicalisationSilvia Cazacu, Georgia Panagiotidou, Thérèse Steenberghen, Andrew Vande MoereCHI 2025 · 9 citations
- Reimagining Data Work: Participatory Annotation Workshops as Feminist PracticeYujia Gao, Isadora Araujo Cruxên, Helena Suárez Val, Alessandra Jungs de Almeida et al.CHI 2026 · 2 citations
- Attorneys and AI: How Lawyers Use Artificial Intelligence and Analyze Its ImpactsEddie A. Gomez Schieber, Nathaniel Kite, Matthew I. Hall, Christian Turner et al.CSCW 2025 · 1 citation
- Labor, Capital, and Machine: Toward a Labor Process Theory for HCIYigang Qin, EunJeong CheonCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Infrastructuring Critical Data Literacy through Role-playing: a Retrospective Study of the Game 'Datopolis'Silvia Cazacu, Elena Simperl, Gefion Thuermer, Joe Massey et al.CSCW 2025
Related papers
- Exploring Approaches to Data Literacy Through a Critical Race Theory PerspectiveBritney Johnson, Ben Rydal Shapiro, Betsy DiSalvo, Annabel Rothschild et al.CHI 2021 · 31 citations
- No! Re-imagining Data Practices Through the Lens of Critical RefusalPatricia Garcia, Tonia Sutherland, Niloufar Salehi, Marika Cifor et al.CSCW 2022 · 46 citations
- Model Positionality and Computational Reflexivity: Promoting Reflexivity in Data ScienceScott Allen Cambo, Darren GergleCHI 2022 · 49 citations
- How Data Workers Shape Datasets: The Role of Positionality in Data Collection and Annotation for Computer VisionMorgan Klaus Scheuerman, Allison Woodruff, Jed R. BrubakerCSCW 2025 · 3 citations
- Products of Positionality: How Tech Workers Shape Identity Concepts in Computer VisionMorgan Klaus Scheuerman, Jed R. BrubakerCHI 2024 · 20 citations
