Disentangling the Power Dynamics in Participatory Data Physicalisation
Silvia Cazacu, Georgia Panagiotidou, Thérèse Steenberghen, Andrew Vande Moere
Abstract
Participatory data physicalisation (PDP) is recognised for its potential to support data-driven decisions among stakeholders who collaboratively construct physical elements into commonly insightful visualisations. Like all participatory processes, PDP is however influenced by underlying power dynamics that might lead to issues regarding extractive participation, marginalisation, or exclusion, among others. We first identified the decisions behind these power dynamics by developing an ontology that synthesises critical theoretical insights from both visualisation and participatory design research, which were then systematically applied unto a representative corpus of 23 PDP artefacts. By revealing how shared decisions are guided by different agendas, this paper presents three contributions: 1) a cross-disciplinary ontology that facilitates the systematic analysis of existing and novel PDP artefacts and processes; which leads to 2) six PDP agendas that reflect the key power dynamics in current PDP practice, revealing the diversity of orientations towards stakeholder participation in PDP practice; and 3) a set of critical considerations that should guide how power dynamics can be balanced, such as by reflecting on how issues are represented, data is contextualised, participants express their meanings, and how participants can dissent with flexible artefact construction. Consequently, this study advances a feminist research agenda by guiding researchers and practitioners in openly reflecting on and sharing responsibilities in data physicalisation and participatory data visualisation.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext fa40fc7c-bdf9-4662-afa7-55b38c580220Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on23
- What's the Situation with Situated Visualization? A Survey and Perspectives on SituatednessNathalie Bressa, Henrik Korsgaard, Aurélien Tabard, Steven Houben et al.IEEE VIS 2021 · 125 citations
- Making Data Tangible: A Cross-disciplinary Design Space for Data PhysicalizationS. Sandra Bae, Clement Zheng, Mary Etta West, Ellen Yi-Luen Do et al.CHI 2022 · 123 citations
- Surfacing Visualization MiragesAndrew M. McNutt, Gordon Kindlmann, Michael CorrellCHI 2020 · 103 citations
- Yes: Affirmative Consent as a Theoretical Framework for Understanding and Imagining Social PlatformsJane Im, Jill Dimond, Melody Berton, Una Lee et al.CHI 2021 · 100 citations
- A Critical Reflection on Visualization Research: Where Do Decision Making Tasks Hide?Evanthia Dimara, John T. StaskoIEEE VIS 2021 · 56 citations
Related papers
- Put a Label On It! Approaches for Constructing and Contextualizing Bar Chart PhysicalizationsKim Sauvé, Argenis Ramirez Gomez, Steven HoubenCHI 2022 · 11 citations
- The Social Construction of Visualizations: Practitioner Challenges and Experiences of Visualizing Race and GenderPriya Dhawka, Sayamindu DasguptaCHI 2025 · 3 citations
- Troubling Collaboration: Matters of Care for Visualization Design StudyDerya Akbaba, Devin Lange, Michael Correll, Alexander Lex et al.CHI 2023 · 41 citations
- Exploring Co-located Interactions with a Shape-Changing Bar ChartMiriam Sturdee, Hayat Kara, Jason AlexanderCHI 2023 · 8 citations
- Touch, Gesture, and Conversation: A Case Study in the Choreography of Interaction with a Data PhysicalizationLaura J. Perovich, Christina Wu, Bernice E. Rogowitz, Dietmar OffenhuberCHI 2026 · 1 citation
