Beyond Explicit and Implicit: How Users Provide Feedback to Shape Personalized Recommendation Content
Wenqi Li, Jui-Ching Kuo, Manyu Sheng, Pengyi Zhang, Qunfang Wu
Abstract
As personalized recommendation algorithms become integral to social media platforms, users are increasingly aware of their ability to influence recommendation content. However, limited research has explored how users provide feedback through their behaviors and platform mechanisms to shape the recommendation content. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 34 active users of algorithmic-driven social media platforms (e.g., Xiaohongshu, Douyin). In addition to explicit and implicit feedback, this study introduced intentional implicit feedback, highlighting the actions users intentionally took to refine recommendation content through perceived feedback mechanisms. Additionally, choices of feedback behaviors were found to align with specific purposes. Explicit feedback was primarily used for feed customization, while unintentional implicit feedback was more linked to content consumption. Intentional implicit feedback was employed for multiple purposes, particularly in increasing content diversity and improving recommendation relevance. This work underscores the user intention dimension in the explicit-implicit feedback dichotomy and offers insights for designing personalized recommendation feedback that better responds to users’ needs.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0e78f1aa-b07c-4e53-b1d9-4c755a8dfc83Cited by top-tier papers3
- Governance of AI-Generated Content: A Case Study on Social Media PlatformsLan Gao, Abani Ahmed, Oscar Chen, Margaux Reyl et al.CHI 2026 · 3 citations
- iRULER: Intelligible Rubric-Based User-Defined LLM Evaluation for RevisionJingwen Bai, Wei Soon Cheong, Philippe Muller, Brian Y. LimCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Fairness-in-the-Workflow: How Machine Learning Practitioners at Big Tech Companies Approach Fairness in Recommender SystemsJing Nathan Yan, Emma Harvey, Junxiong Wang, Jeffrey M. Rzeszotarski et al.CHI 2026
Builds on10
- Algorithmic Folk Theories and Identity: How TikTok Users Co-Produce Knowledge of Identity and Engage in Algorithmic ResistanceNadia Karizat, Daniel Delmonaco, Motahhare Eslami, Nazanin AndalibiCSCW 2021 · 338 citations
- For You, or For"You"?: Everyday LGBTQ+ Encounters with TikTokEllen Simpson, Bryan C. SemaanCSCW 2020 · 228 citations
- Everyday Algorithm Auditing: Understanding the Power of Everyday Users in Surfacing Harmful Algorithmic BehaviorsHong Shen, Alicia DeVos, Motahhare Eslami, Kenneth HolsteinCSCW 2021 · 156 citations
- The Algorithmic Crystal: Conceptualizing the Self through Algorithmic Personalization on TikTokAngela Y. Lee, Hannah Mieczkowski, Nicole B. Ellison, Jeffrey T. HancockCSCW 2022 · 127 citations
- Toward User-Driven Algorithm Auditing: Investigating users' strategies for uncovering harmful algorithmic behaviorAlicia DeVos, Aditi Dhabalia, Hong Shen, Kenneth Holstein et al.CHI 2022 · 96 citations
Related papers
- Why Social Media Users Press 'Not Interested': Motivations, Anticipated Effects, and Result InterpretationJihyeong Hong, Eun-Young Ko, Juho Kim, Jeong-woo JangCSCW 2025 · 3 citations
- "They've Over-Emphasized That One Search": Controlling Unwanted Content on TikTok's For You PageJulie A. Vera, Sourojit GhoshCHI 2025 · 3 citations
- Understanding the Gap Between Stated and Revealed Preferences in Social Media News FeedsDo Won Kim, Cody Buntain, Giovanni Luca CiampagliaCSCW 2026
- Social Media Feed ElicitationLindsay Popowski, Xiyuan Wu, Xuyang Zhu, Tiziano Piccardi et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
- TikTok and the Art of Personalization: Investigating Exploration and Exploitation on Social Media FeedsKaran Vombatkere, Sepehr Mousavi, Savvas Zannettou, Franziska Roesner et al.WWW 2024 · 45 citations
