Hug Reports : Supporting Expression of Appreciation between Users and Contributors of Open Source Software Packages
Pranav Khadpe, Olivia Xu, Geoff Kaufman, Chinmay Kulkarni
Abstract
Contributors to open source software packages often describe feeling discouraged by the lack of positive feedback from users. This paper describes a technology probe, Hug Reports, that provides users a communication affordance within their code editors, through which users can convey appreciation to contributors of packages they use. In our field study, 18 users interacted with the probe for 3 weeks, resulting in messages of appreciation to 550 contributors, 26 of whom participated in subsequent research. Our findings show how locating a communication affordance within the code editor, and allowing users to express appreciation in terms of the abstractions they are exposed to (packages, modules, functions), can support exchanges of appreciation that are meaningful to users and contributors. Findings also revealed the moments in which users expressed appreciation, the two meanings that appreciation took on -- as a measure of utility and as an act of expressive communication -- and how contributors' reactions to appreciation were influenced by their perceived level of contribution. Based on these findings, we discuss opportunities and challenges for designing appreciation systems for open source in particular, and peer production communities more generally.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0e6a278d-ee19-4f51-9a41-c063ca64cbc2Cited by top-tier papers3
- Navigating Uncertainties: How GenAI Developers Document Their Models on Open-Source PlatformsNingjing Tang, Megan Li, Amy A. Winecoff, Michael Madaio et al.CHI 2026 · 3 citations
- Realism Drives Interpersonal Reciprocity but Yields to AI-Assisted Egocentrism in a Coordination ExperimentHirokazu Shirado, Kye Shimizu, Nicholas A. Christakis, Shunichi KasaharaCHI 2025 · 1 citation
- "I Just Don't Want My Work Being Fed Into The AI Blender": Queer Artists on Refusing and Resisting Generative AIJordan Taylor, Joel Mire, Alicia DeVrio, Maarten Sap et al.CSCW 2026
Builds on13
- Will AI Console Me when I Lose my Pet? Understanding Perceptions of AI-Mediated Email WritingYihe Liu, Anushk Mittal, Diyi Yang, Amy S. BruckmanCHI 2022 · 86 citations
- "Did You Miss My Comment or What?" Understanding Toxicity in Open Source DiscussionsCourtney Miller, Sophie Cohen, Daniel Klug, Bogdan Vasilescu et al.ICSE 2022 · 54 citations
- The Labor of Maintaining and Scaling Free and Open-Source Software ProjectsR. Stuart Geiger, Dorothy Howard, Lilly IraniCSCW 2021 · 49 citations
- Code of Conduct Conversations in Open Source Software Projects on GithubRenee Li, Pavitthra Pandurangan, Hana Frluckaj, Laura DabbishCSCW 2021 · 49 citations
- The Long Road Ahead: Ongoing Challenges in Contributing to Large OSS Organizations and What to DoMariam Guizani, Amreeta Chatterjee, Bianca Trinkenreich, Mary Evelyn May et al.CSCW 2021 · 42 citations
Related papers
- Do I Belong? Modeling Sense of Virtual Community Among Linux Kernel ContributorsBianca Trinkenreich, Klaas-Jan Stol, Anita Sarma, Daniel M. Germán et al.ICSE 2023 · 21 citations
- Understanding the impact of GitHub suggested changes on recommendations between developersChris Brown, Chris ParninFSE 2020 · 18 citations
- A case study of implicit mentoring, its prevalence, and impact in ApacheZixuan Feng, Amreeta Chatterjee, Anita Sarma, Iftekhar AhmedFSE 2022 · 17 citations
- Characterizing Developers' Linguistic Behaviors in Open Source Development across Their Social StatusesYisi Han, Zhendong Wang, Yang Feng, Zhihong Zhao et al.CSCW 2024 · 3 citations
- Code Recommendation for Open Source Software DevelopersYiqiao Jin, Yunsheng Bai, Yanqiao Zhu, Yizhou Sun et al.WWW 2023 · 28 citations
