Using Fourier Analysis and Mutant Clustering to Accelerate DNN Mutation Testing
Ali Ghanbari, Sasan Tavakkol
Abstract
Deep neural network (DNN) mutation analysis is a promising approach to evaluating test set adequacy. Due to the large number of generated mutants that must be tested on large datasets, mutation analysis is costly. In this paper, we present a technique, named DM#, for accelerating DNN mutation testing using Fourier analysis. The key insight is that DNN outputs are real-valued functions suitable for Fourier analysis that can be leveraged to quantify mutant behavior using only a few data points. DM# uses the quantified mutant behavior to cluster the mutants so that the ones with similar behavior fall into the same group. A representative from each group is then selected for testing, and the result of the test, e.g., whether the mutant is killed or survived, is reused for all other mutants represented by the selected mutant, obviating the need for testing other mutants. 14 DNN models of sizes ranging from thousands to millions of parameters, trained on different datasets, are used to evaluate DM# and compare it to several baseline techniques. Our results provide empirical evidence on the effectiveness of DM# in accelerating mutation testing by 28.38%, on average, at the average cost of only 0.72% error in mutation score. Moreover, on average, DM# incurs 11. 78, 15.16, and 114.36 times less mutation score error compared to random mutant selection, boundary sample selection, and random sample selection techniques, respectively, while generally offering comparable speed-up.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0de6f5f8-12f9-46ec-81a9-32cfbe04691bCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on7
- Prioritizing Test Inputs for Deep Neural Networks via Mutation AnalysisZan Wang, Hanmo You, Junjie Chen, Yingyi Zhang et al.ICSE 2021 · 117 citations
- DeepCrime: mutation testing of deep learning systems based on real faultsNargiz Humbatova, Gunel Jahangirova, Paolo TonellaISSTA 2021 · 114 citations
- DeepMetis: Augmenting a Deep Learning Test Set to Increase its Mutation ScoreVincenzo Riccio, Nargiz Humbatova, Gunel Jahangirova, Paolo TonellaASE 2021 · 41 citations
- Hierarchical Agglomerative Graph Clustering in Poly-Logarithmic DepthLaxman Dhulipala, David Eisenstat, Jakub Lacki, Vahab Mirrokni et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24 citations
- Mutation-based Fault Localization of Deep Neural NetworksAli Ghanbari, Deepak-George Thomas, Muhammad Arbab Arshad, Hridesh RajanASE 2023 · 20 citations
Related papers
- Decomposition of Deep Neural Networks into Modules via Mutation AnalysisAli GhanbariISSTA 2024 · 4 citations
- Fuzz testing based data augmentation to improve robustness of deep neural networksXiang Gao, Ripon K. Saha, Mukul R. Prasad, Abhik RoychoudhuryICSE 2020 · 116 citations
- Dynamic Data Fault Localization for Deep Neural NetworksYining Yin, Yang Feng, Shihao Weng, Zixi Liu et al.FSE 2023 · 10 citations
- Distribution-Aware Testing of Neural Networks Using Generative ModelsSwaroopa Dola, Matthew B. Dwyer, Mary Lou SoffaICSE 2021 · 3 citations
- DeepGini: prioritizing massive tests to enhance the robustness of deep neural networksYang Feng, Qingkai Shi, Xinyu Gao, Jun Wan et al.ISSTA 2020 · 206 citations
