Machine Learning with Privacy for Protected Attributes
Saeed Mahloujifar, Chuan Guo, G. Edward Suh, Kamalika Chaudhuri
Abstract
Differential privacy (DP) has become the standard for private data analysis. Certain machine learning applications only require privacy protection for specific protected attributes. Using naive variants of differential privacy in such use cases can result in unnecessary degradation of utility. In this work, we refine the definition of DP to create a more general and flexible framework that we call feature differential privacy (FDP). Our definition is simulation-based and allows for both addition/removal and replacement variants of privacy, and can handle arbitrary and adaptive separation of protected and non-protected features. We prove the properties of FDP, such as adaptive composition, and demonstrate its implications for limiting attribute inference attacks. We also propose a modification of the standard DP-SGD algorithm that satisfies FDP while leveraging desirable properties such as amplification via sub-sampling. We apply our framework to various machine learning tasks and show that it can significantly improve the utility of DP-trained models when public features are available. For example, we train diffusion models on the AFHQ dataset of animal faces and observe a drastic improvement in FID compared to DP, from 286.7 to 101.9 at ∊ = 8, assuming that the blurred version of a training image is available as a public feature. Overall, our work provides a new approach to private data analysis that can help reduce the utility cost of DP while still providing strong privacy guarantees.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0dd18dd9-3897-45bd-b2b8-5e6b3262bafaCited by top-tier papers2
- Differentially Private 2D Human Pose EstimationKaushik Bhargav Sivangi, Paul Henderson, Fani DeligianniCVPR 2026 · 1 citation
- Private Learning with Public Feature ConditioningShuli Jiang, Walid Krichene, Nicolas MayorazICML 2026
Builds on13
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Property Inference Attacks on Fully Connected Neural Networks using Permutation Invariant RepresentationsKaran Ganju, Qi Wang, Wei Yang, Carl A. Gunter et al.CCS 2018 · 574 citations
- Large Language Models Can Be Strong Differentially Private LearnersXuechen Li, Florian Tramèr, Percy Liang, Tatsunori HashimotoICLR 2022 · 502 citations
- AttriGuard: A Practical Defense Against Attribute Inference Attacks via Adversarial Machine LearningJinyuan Jia, Neil Zhenqiang GongUSENIX Security 2018 · 194 citations
- Deep Learning with Label Differential PrivacyBadih Ghazi, Noah Golowich, Ravi Kumar, Pasin Manurangsi et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 193 citations
Related papers
- Bounding training data reconstruction in DP-SGDJamie Hayes, Borja Balle, Saeed MahloujifarNeurIPS 2023 · 73 citations
- Effectively Using Public Data in Privacy Preserving Machine LearningMilad Nasr, Saeed Mahloujifar, Xinyu Tang, Prateek Mittal et al.ICML 2023 · 22 citations
- Closed-Form Bounds for DP-SGD against Record-level InferenceGiovanni Cherubin, Boris Köpf, Andrew Paverd, Shruti Tople et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 2 citations
- DPMLBench: Holistic Evaluation of Differentially Private Machine LearningChengkun Wei, Minghu Zhao, Zhikun Zhang, Min Chen et al.CCS 2023 · 5 citations
- A Linear Reconstruction Approach for Attribute Inference Attacks against Synthetic DataMeenatchi Sundaram Muthu Selva Annamalai, Andrea Gadotti, Luc RocherUSENIX Security 2024 · 37 citations
