DPMLBench: Holistic Evaluation of Differentially Private Machine Learning
Chengkun Wei, Minghu Zhao, Zhikun Zhang, Min Chen, Wenlong Meng, Bo Liu, Yuan Fan, Wenzhi Chen
Abstract
Differential privacy (DP), as a rigorous mathematical definition quantifying privacy leakage, has become a wellaccepted standard for privacy protection. Combined with powerful machine learning techniques, differentially private machine learning (DPML) is increasingly important. As the most classic DPML algorithm, DP-SGD incurs a significant loss of utility, which hinders DPML's deployment in practice. Many studies have recently proposed improved algorithms based on DP-SGD to mitigate utility loss. However, these studies are isolated and cannot comprehensively measure the performance of improvements proposed in algorithms. More importantly, there is a lack of comprehensive research to compare improvements in these DPML algorithms across utility, defensive capabilities, and generalizability. We fill this gap by performing a holistic measurement of improved DPML algorithms on utility and defense capability against membership inference attacks (MIAs) on image classification tasks. We first present a taxonomy of where improvements are located in the machine learning life cycle. Based on our taxonomy, we jointly perform an extensive measurement study of the improved DPML algorithms, over twelve algorithms, four model architectures, four datasets, two attacks, and various privacy budget configurations. We also cover state-of-the-art label differential privacy (Label DP) algorithms in the evaluation. According to our empirical results, DP can effectively defend against MIAs, and sensitivity-bounding techniques such as per-sample gradient clipping play an important role in defense. We also explore some improvements that can maintain model utility and defend against MIAs more effectively. Experiments show that Label DP algorithms achieve less utility loss but are fragile to MIAs. Machine learning practitioners may benefit from these evaluations to select appropriate algorithms. To support our evaluation, we implement a modular re-usable software, DPMLBench, 1 which enables sensitive data owners to deploy DPML algorithms and serves as a benchmark tool for researchers and practitioners.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b050f019-cc9e-4942-937c-8cf65b5922f8Cited by top-tier papers11
- "What do you want from theory alone?" Experimenting with Tight Auditing of Differentially Private Synthetic Data GenerationMeenatchi Sundaram Muthu Selva Annamalai, Georgi Ganev, Emiliano De CristofaroUSENIX Security 2024 · 24 citations
- DPAdapter: Improving Differentially Private Deep Learning through Noise Tolerance Pre-trainingZihao Wang, Rui Zhu, Dongruo Zhou, Zhikun Zhang et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 9 citations
- Benchmarking Secure Sampling Protocols for Differential PrivacyYucheng Fu, Tianhao WangCCS 2024 · 5 citations
- Graphical vs. Deep Generative Models: Measuring the Impact of Differentially Private Mechanisms and Budgets on UtilityGeorgi Ganev, Kai Xu, Emiliano De CristofaroCCS 2024 · 5 citations
- ArtistAuditor: Auditing Artist Style Pirate in Text-to-Image Generation ModelsLinkang Du, Zheng Zhu, Min Chen, Zhou Su et al.WWW 2025 · 5 citations
Builds on37
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Comprehensive Privacy Analysis of Deep Learning: Passive and Active White-box Inference Attacks against Centralized and Federated LearningMilad Nasr, Reza Shokri, Amir HoumansadrS&P 2019 · 1,778 citations
- Exploiting Unintended Feature Leakage in Collaborative LearningLuca Melis, Congzheng Song, Emiliano De Cristofaro, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2019 · 1,736 citations
Related papers
- Closed-Form Bounds for DP-SGD against Record-level InferenceGiovanni Cherubin, Boris Köpf, Andrew Paverd, Shruti Tople et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 2 citations
- Evaluations of Machine Learning Privacy Defenses are MisleadingMichael Aerni, Jie Zhang, Florian TramèrCCS 2024 · 12 citations
- RelaxLoss: Defending Membership Inference Attacks without Losing UtilityDingfan Chen, Ning Yu, Mario FritzICLR 2022 · 61 citations
- Membership Privacy for Machine Learning Models Through Knowledge TransferVirat Shejwalkar, Amir HoumansadrAAAI 2021 · 130 citations
- SoK: Can Synthetic Images Replace Real Data? A Survey of Utility and Privacy of Synthetic Image GenerationYunsung Chung, Yunbei Zhang, Nassir Marrouche, Jihun HammUSENIX Security 2025
