PETS: A Principled Framework Towards Optimal Trajectory Allocation for Efficient Test-Time Self-Consistency
Zhangyi Liu, Huaizhi Qu, Xiaowei Yin, He Sun, Yanjun Han, Tianlong Chen, Xinyu Yang
Abstract
Test-time scaling can improve model performance by aggregating stochastic reasoning trajectories. However, achieving sample-efficient test-time self-consistency under a limited budget remains an open challenge. We introduce PETS (Principled and Efficient Test-Time Self-Consistency), which initiates a principled study of trajectory allocation through an optimization framework. Central to our approach is the self-consistency rate, a new measure defined as agreement with the infinite-budget majority vote. This formulation makes sampleefficient test-time allocation theoretically grounded and amenable to rigorous analysis. We study both offline and online settings. In the offline regime, where all questions are known in advance, we connect trajectory allocation to crowdsourcing, a classic and well-developed area, by modeling reasoning traces as workers. This perspective allows us to leverage rich existing theory, yielding theoretical guarantees and an efficient majority-voting-based allocation algorithm. In the online streaming regime, where questions arrive sequentially and allocations must be made on the fly, we propose a novel method inspired by the offline framework. Our approach adapts budgets to question difficulty while preserving strong theoretical guarantees and computational efficiency. Experiments show that PETS consistently outperforms uniform allocation. On GPQA, PETS achieves perfect self-consistency in both settings while reducing the sampling budget by up to 75% (offline) and 55% (online) relative to uniform allocation. Code is available at: this https URL.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0db767c9-7cfe-4be6-af97-f45dcf4b476cBuilds on7
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language ModelsXuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V. Le et al.ICLR 2023 · 681 citations
- Deep Think with ConfidenceYichao Fu, Xuewei Wang, Hao Zhang, Yuandong Tian et al.ICLR 2026 · 171 citations
- Escape Sky-high Cost: Early-stopping Self-Consistency for Multi-step ReasoningYiwei Li, Peiwen Yuan, Shaoxiong Feng, Boyuan Pan et al.ICLR 2024 · 101 citations
- Every Rollout Counts: Optimal Resource Allocation for Efficient Test-Time ScalingXinglin Wang, Yiwei Li, Shaoxiong Feng, Peiwen Yuan et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 16 citations
Related papers
- Optimal Self-Consistency for Efficient Reasoning with Large Language ModelsAustin Feng, Marius Alonso, Ambroise Odonnat, Vasilii Feofanov et al.ICML 2026 · 6 citations
- Does Thinking More Always Help? Mirage of Test-Time Scaling in Reasoning ModelsSoumya Suvra Ghosal, Souradip Chakraborty, Avinash Reddy, Yifu Lu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 43 citations
- Tracing the Traces: Latent Temporal Signals for Efficient and Accurate ReasoningMartina G. Vilas, Safoora Yousefi, Besmira Nushi, Eric Horvitz et al.ICLR 2026 · 12 citations
- Slim-SC: Thought Pruning for Efficient Scaling with Self-ConsistencyColin Hong, Xu Guo, Anand Chaanan Singh, Esha Choukse et al.EMNLP 2025
- Beyond Majority Voting: Self-Reflective Test-Time Reinforcement Learning for LLM ReasoningSitong Wu, Haoru Tan, Xichen Zhang, Bin Xia et al.ICML 2026
