Curriculum Design for Trajectory-Constrained Agent: Compressing Chain-of-Thought Tokens in LLMs
Georgios Tzannetos, Parameswaran Kamalaruban, Adish Singla
Abstract
Training agents to operate under strict constraints during deployment, such as limited resource budgets or stringent safety requirements, presents significant challenges, especially when these constraints render the task complex. In this work, we propose a curriculum learning strategy that gradually tightens constraints during training, enabling the agent to incrementally master the deployment requirements. Inspired by self-paced learning techniques in unconstrained reinforcement learning (RL), our approach facilitates a smoother transition to challenging environments by initially training on simplified versions of the constraints and progressively introducing the full deployment conditions. We provide a theoretical analysis using an RL agent in a binary-tree Markov Decision Process (MDP) to demonstrate that our curriculum strategy can accelerate training relative to a baseline approach that imposes the trajectory constraints from the outset. Moreover, we empirically validate the effectiveness and generality of our method across both RL and large language model (LLM) agents in diverse settings, including a binary-tree MDP, a multi-task navigation domain, and a math reasoning task with two benchmarks. These results highlight the potential of curriculum design in enhancing the efficiency and performance of agents operating under complex trajectory constraints during deployment. Moreover, when applied to LLMs, our strategy enables compression of output chain-of-thought tokens, achieving a substantial inference speedup on consumer hardware, demonstrating its effectiveness for resource-constrained deployment.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0c765d51-d126-46c7-ada1-9c058b7c1f9aBuilds on19
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- ZeRO: memory optimizations toward training trillion parameter modelsSamyam Rajbhandari, Jeff Rasley, Olatunji Ruwase, Yuxiong HeSC 2020 · 852 citations
- MetaMath: Bootstrap Your Own Mathematical Questions for Large Language ModelsLonghui Yu, Weisen Jiang, Han Shi, Jincheng Yu et al.ICLR 2024 · 637 citations
- Emergent Complexity and Zero-shot Transfer via Unsupervised Environment DesignMichael Dennis, Natasha Jaques, Eugene Vinitsky, Alexandre M. Bayen et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 362 citations
- Projection-Based Constrained Policy OptimizationTsung-Yen Yang, Justinian Rosca, Karthik Narasimhan, Peter J. RamadgeICLR 2020 · 306 citations
Related papers
- Safety-Prioritizing Curricula for Constrained Reinforcement LearningCevahir Köprülü, Thiago D. Simão, Nils Jansen, Ufuk TopcuICLR 2025
- Provable Sample Efficiency of Curriculum Post-Training for Transformer ReasoningDake Bu, Wei Huang, Andi Han, Atsushi Nitanda et al.ICML 2026
- h1: Bootstrapping LLMs to Reason over Longer Horizons via Reinforcement LearningAlesia Ivanova, Sumeet Motwani, Jack Cai, Phil Torr et al.ICML 2026 · 11 citations
- Self-Paced Deep Reinforcement LearningPascal Klink, Carlo D'Eramo, Jan Peters, Joni PajarinenNeurIPS 2020 · 83 citations
- Curriculum Reinforcement Learning from Easy to Hard Tasks Improves LLM ReasoningShubham Parashar, Shurui Gui, Xiner Li, Hongyi Ling et al.ICLR 2026 · 112 citations
