An Optimized Franz-Parisi Criterion and its Equivalence with SQ Lower Bounds
Siyu Chen, Theodor Misiakiewicz, Ilias Zadik, Peiyuan Zhang
Abstract
Bandeira et al (The Franz–Parisi (FP) criterion and computational trade-offs in high dimensional statistics Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 33831–44) introduced the FP criterion for characterizing the computational hard phases in statistical detection problems. The FP criterion, based on an annealed version of the celebrated FP potential from statistical physics, was shown to be equivalent to low-degree polynomial lower bounds for Gaussian additive models (GAMs), thereby connecting two distinct approaches to understanding the computational hardness in statistical inference. In this paper, we propose a refined FP criterion that aims to better capture the geometric ‘overlap’ structure of statistical models. Our main result establishes that this optimized FP criterion is equivalent to statistical query (SQ) lower bounds—another foundational framework in computational complexity of statistical inference. Crucially, this equivalence holds under a mild, verifiable assumption satisfied by a broad class of statistical models, including GAMs, planted sparse models, as well as non-Gaussian component analysis (NGCA), single-index (SI) models, and convex truncation detection settings. For instance, in the case of convex truncation tasks, the assumption is equivalent with the Gaussian correlation inequality (Royen, 2014) from convex geometry. In addition to the above, our equivalence not only unifies and simplifies the derivation of several known SQ lower bounds–such as for the NGCA model and the SI model–but also yields new SQ lower bounds of independent interest, including for the computational gaps in mixed sparse linear regression (mSLR) and convex truncation.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0c15e83d-bb44-4e5a-89f7-d3f47bc8882aCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on3
- The Franz-Parisi Criterion and Computational Trade-offs in High Dimensional StatisticsAfonso S. Bandeira, Ahmed El Alaoui, Samuel B. Hopkins, Tselil Schramm et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 51 citations
- Testing Convex TruncationAnindya De, Shivam Nadimpalli, Rocco A. ServedioSODA 2023 · 3 citations
- Can Neural Networks Achieve Optimal Computational-statistical Tradeoff? An Analysis on Single-Index ModelSiyu Chen, Beining Wu, Miao Lu, Zhuoran Yang et al.ICLR 2025
Related papers
- SQ Lower Bounds for Non-Gaussian Component Analysis with Weaker AssumptionsIlias Diakonikolas, Daniel Kane, Lisheng Ren, Yuxin SunNeurIPS 2023 · 17 citations
- Sum-of-Squares Lower Bounds for Non-Gaussian Component AnalysisIlias Diakonikolas, Sushrut Karmalkar, Shuo Pang, Aaron PotechinFOCS 2024 · 1 citation
- PTF Testing Lower Bounds for Non-Gaussian Component AnalysisIlias Diakonikolas, Daniel M. Kane, Sihan Liu, Thanasis PittasFOCS 2025 · 1 citation
- Computational and Statistical Tradeoffs in Inferring Combinatorial Structures of Ising ModelYing Jin, Zhaoran Wang, Junwei LuICML 2020 · 2 citations
- A Unified Approach to Memory-Sample Tradeoffs for Detecting Planted StructuresSumegha Garg, Jabari Hastings, Chirag Pabbaraju, Vatsal SharanSTOC 2026 · 1 citation
