Transformation Driven Visual Reasoning
Xin Hong, Yanyan Lan, Liang Pang, Jiafeng Guo, Xueqi Cheng
Abstract
This paper defines a new visual reasoning paradigm by introducing an important factor, i.e. transformation. The motivation comes from the fact that most existing visual reasoning tasks, such as CLEVR in VQA, are solely defined to test how well the machine understands the concepts and relations within static settings, like one image. We argue that this kind of state driven visual reasoning approach has limitations in reflecting whether the machine has the ability to infer the dynamics between different states, which has been shown as important as state-level reasoning for human cognition in Piaget's theory. To tackle this problem, we propose a novel transformation driven visual reasoning task. Given both the initial and final states, the target is to infer the corresponding single-step or multistep transformation, represented as a triplet (object, attribute, value) or a sequence of triplets, respectively. Following this definition, a new dataset namely TRANCE is constructed on the basis of CLEVR, including three levels of settings, i.e. Basic (single-step transformation), Event (multi-step transformation), and View (multi-step transformation with variant views). Experimental results show that the state-of-the-art visual reasoning models perform well on Basic, but are still far from human-level intelligence on Event and View. We believe the proposed new paradigm will boost the development of machine visual reasoning. More advanced methods and real data need to be investigated in this direction. The resource of TVR is available at https://hongxin2019.github.io/TVR .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0b9e66ce-fd7d-4ed5-9b4c-74ef3cdb82a0Cited by top-tier papers8
- Visual Abductive ReasoningChen Liang, Wenguan Wang, Tianfei Zhou, Yi YangCVPR 2022 · 50 citations
- Reason-RFT: Reinforcement Fine-Tuning for Visual Reasoning of Vision Language ModelsHuajie Tan, Yuheng Ji, Xiaoshuai Hao, Xiansheng Chen et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 45 citations
- VQA-GNN: Reasoning with Multimodal Knowledge via Graph Neural Networks for Visual Question AnsweringYanan Wang, Michihiro Yasunaga, Hongyu Ren, Shinya Wada et al.ICCV 2023 · 42 citations
- The STVchrono Dataset: Towards Continuous Change Recognition in TimeYanjun Sun, Yue Qiu, Mariia Khan, Fumiya Matsuzawa et al.CVPR 2024 · 6 citations
- CoG-DQA: Chain-of-Guiding Learning with Large Language Models for Diagram Question AnsweringShaowei Wang, Lingling Zhang, Longji Zhu, Tao Qin et al.CVPR 2024 · 5 citations
Builds on4
- CLEVRER: Collision Events for Video Representation and ReasoningKexin Yi, Chuang Gan, Yunzhu Li, Pushmeet Kohli et al.ICLR 2020 · 584 citations
- Robust Change CaptioningDong Huk Park, Trevor Darrell, Anna RohrbachICCV 2019 · 217 citations
- CoPhy: Counterfactual Learning of Physical DynamicsFabien Baradel, Natalia Neverova, Julien Mille, Greg Mori et al.ICLR 2020 · 105 citations
- Symmetry and Group in Attribute-Object CompositionsYong-Lu Li, Yue Xu, Xiaohan Mao, Cewu LuCVPR 2020
Related papers
- REX: Reasoning-aware and Grounded ExplanationShi Chen, Qi ZhaoCVPR 2022 · 24 citations
- Graph Representation for Order-aware Visual TransformationYue Qiu, Yanjun Sun, Fumiya Matsuzawa, Kenji Iwata et al.CVPR 2023
- RelViT: Concept-guided Vision Transformer for Visual Relational ReasoningXiaojian Ma, Weili Nie, Zhiding Yu, Huaizu Jiang et al.ICLR 2022 · 21 citations
- DARR: A Dual-Branch Arithmetic Regression Reasoning Framework for Solving Machine Number ReasoningChengtai Li, Yee Yang Tan, Yuting He, Jianfeng Ren et al.AAAI 2025 · 6 citations
- Do Vision-Language Transformers Exhibit Visual Commonsense? An Empirical Study of VCRZhenyang Li, Yangyang Guo, Kejie Wang, Xiaolin Chen et al.ACM MM 2023 · 11 citations
