Critical Tokens Matter: Token-Level Contrastive Estimation Enhances LLM's Reasoning Capability
Zicheng Lin, Tian Liang, Jiahao Xu, Qiuzhi Liu, Xing Wang, Ruilin Luo, Chufan Shi, Siheng Li, Yujiu Yang, Zhaopeng Tu
Abstract
Mathematical reasoning tasks pose significant challenges for large language models (LLMs) because they require precise logical deduction and sequence analysis. In this work, we introduce the concept of critical tokens -elements within reasoning trajectories that significantly influence incorrect outcomes. We present a novel framework for identifying these tokens through rollout sampling and demonstrate their substantial divergence from traditional error tokens. Through extensive experiments on datasets such as GSM8K and MATH500, we show that identifying and replacing critical tokens significantly improves model accuracy. We propose an efficient methodology for pinpointing these tokens in large-scale datasets using contrastive estimation and extend this framework to enhance model training processes with direct preference optimization (DPO). Experimental results on GSM8K and MATH500 benchmarks with the widely used models Llama-3 (8B and 70B) and Deepseek-math (7B) demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach, cDPO. Our results underscore the potential of leveraging critical tokens to reduce errors in reasoning tasks, advancing the development of AI systems capable of robust logical deduction.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers27
- Agentic Reinforced Policy OptimizationGuanting Dong, Hangyu Mao, Kai Ma, Licheng Bao et al.ICLR 2026 · 146 citations
- Spotlight on Token Perception for Multimodal Reinforcement LearningSiyuan Huang, Xiaoye Qu, Yafu Li, Yun Luo et al.ICLR 2026 · 45 citations
- Attention Illuminates LLM Reasoning: The Uncovered Preplan-and-Anchor Rhythm Enables Fine-Grained Policy OptimizationYang Li, Zhichen Dong, Yuhan Sun, Weixun Wang et al.ICML 2026 · 25 citations
- Sparse but Critical: A Token-Level Analysis of Distributional Shifts in RLVR Fine-Tuning of LLMsHaoming Meng, Kexin Huang, Shaohang Wei, Chiyu Ma et al.ICLR 2026 · 24 citations
- Group Critical-token Policy Optimization for Autoregressive Image GenerationGuohui Zhang, Hu Yu, Xiaoxiao Ma, JingHao Zhang et al.ICLR 2026 · 16 citations
Builds on16
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
Related papers
- Subtle Errors in Reasoning: Preference Learning via Error-injected Self-editingKaishuai Xu, Tiezheng Yu, Wenjun Hou, Yi Cheng et al.ACL 2025 · 1 citation
- GPO: Learning from Critical Steps to Improve LLM ReasoningJiahao Yu, Zelei Cheng, Xian Wu, Xinyu XingNeurIPS 2025 · 10 citations
- Beyond Passive Critical Thinking: Fostering Proactive Questioning to Enhance Human-AI CollaborationAnte Wang, Yujie Lin, Jingyao Liu, Suhang Wu et al.AAAI 2026 · 3 citations
- Beyond Step Pruning: Information Theory Based Step-level Optimization for Self-Refining Large Language ModelsJinman Zhao, Erxue Min, Hui Wu, Ziheng Li et al.AAAI 2026 · 1 citation
- In-Token Rationality Optimization: Towards Accurate and Concise LLM Reasoning via Self-FeedbackMingye Zhu, Yi Liu, Zheren Fu, Quan Wang et al.AAAI 2026 · 1 citation
