QG-SMS: Enhancing Test Item Analysis via Student Modeling and Simulation
Bang Nguyen, Tingting Du, Mengxia Yu, Lawrence Angrave, Meng Jiang
Abstract
While the Question Generation (QG) task has been increasingly adopted in educational assessments, its evaluation remains limited by approaches that lack a clear connection to the educational values of test items. In this work, we introduce test item analysis, a method frequently used by educators to assess test question quality, into QG evaluation. Specifically, we construct pairs of candidate questions that differ in quality across dimensions such as topic coverage, item difficulty, item discrimination, and distractor efficiency. We then examine whether existing QG evaluation approaches can effectively distinguish these differences. Our findings reveal significant shortcomings in these approaches with respect to accurately assessing test item quality in relation to student performance. To address this gap, we propose a novel QG evaluation framework, QG-SMS, which leverages Large Language Model for Student Modeling and Simulation to perform test item analysis. As demonstrated in our extensive experiments and human evaluation study, the additional perspectives introduced by the simulated student profiles lead to a more effective and robust assessment of test items.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0b2797eb-1180-4d38-972a-260018797bf5Cited by top-tier papers2
- Simulated Students in Tutoring Dialogues: Substance or Illusion?Alexander Scarlatos, Jaewook Lee, Simon Woodhead, Andrew LanACL 2026 · 6 citations
- Tailoring Diagnostic Modeling to Individual Learners: Personalized Distractor Generation via MCTS-Guided Reasoning ReconstructionTao Wu, Jingyuan Chen, Wang Lin, Jian Zhan et al.ACL 2026 · 3 citations
Builds on14
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTTianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger et al.ICLR 2020 · 8,443 citations
- Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human BehaviorJoon Sung Park, Joseph C. O'Brien, Carrie Jun Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris et al.UIST 2023 · 1,882 citations
- Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent DebateYilun Du, Shuang Li, Antonio Torralba, Joshua B. Tenenbaum et al.ICML 2024 · 1,562 citations
- ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent DebateChi-Min Chan, Weize Chen, Yusheng Su, Jianxuan Yu et al.ICLR 2024 · 871 citations
Related papers
- IDGen: Item Discrimination Induced Prompt Generation for LLM EvaluationFan Lin, Shuyi Xie, Yong Dai, Wenlin Yao et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 7 citations
- MetaEval: Measuring the Discrimination of Benchmarks for Efficient LLM EvaluationZhuo Wang, Wen Wu, Guoqing Wang, Guangze Ye et al.AAAI 2026 · 1 citation
- EducationQ: Evaluating LLMs' Teaching Capabilities Through Multi-Agent Dialogue FrameworkYao Shi, Rongkeng Liang, Yong XuACL 2025 · 18 citations
- QGEval: Benchmarking Multi-dimensional Evaluation for Question GenerationWeiping Fu, Bifan Wei, Jianxiang Hu, Zhongmin Cai et al.EMNLP 2024 · 8 citations
- Dr.Academy: A Benchmark for Evaluating Questioning Capability in Education for Large Language ModelsYuyan Chen, Songzhou Yan, Panjun Liu, Yanghua XiaoACL 2024 · 8 citations
